Mr. Richard Earl Miller

Attorney in Longview, TX
Phone number not available
View Web Site
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Business
  • Commercial
  • Aviation & Aerospace
  • Corporate
  • Partnership
  • Taxation
  • Construction
  • Regulatory
  • Unfair Competition
  • Franchises & Franchising
  • Trademarks
  • Commercial Real Estate
  • Aviation
  • Real Estate
  • Eminent Domain
  • Environmental
  • Insurance
  • Nonprofit & Charitable Organizations
  • Entertainment & the Arts
  • Litigation
  • Trusts & Estates
  • Wills
  • Intellectual Property
  • Oil & Gas
  • Wills-Trusts-Probate


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1977, Texas
U.S. Supreme Court
1981, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, U.S. Tax Court
1980, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas

Law School Attended

Baylor University
Class of 1977

University Attended

Baylor University
Class of 1969

University of Arkansas Graduate School of Business
Class of 1972

Hobbies & Interests

Mr. Miller is an FAA multi-engine and instrument rated commercial pilot. His global flying experience is in excess of 2000 hours His aviation law practice includes defense of airmen and commercial aeronautical providers regarding FAA revocation and suspension actions. Commercial aviation matters include, but are not limited to issues regarding airc... More

Featured Lawyers

Coghlan Crowson, LLP
Longview, U.S.A.
430-558-5250 | Email
Client Rating

2.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

Monsour Law Firm
Longview, U.S.A.
430-558-5257 | Email
Client Rating

2.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.