Erin C. Duggan Pemberton

Attorney in Lincoln, NE
Phi Alpha Delta; Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing. Executive Editor, Buffalo Criminal Law Review.
(402) 474-1507
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Insurance Defense
  • Legal Malpractice Defense
  • Civil Litigation
  • Complex Litigation
  • Defense Litigation
  • Federal Civil Litigation
  • Trial Practice
  • Medical Malpractice Defense


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2002, New York
2006, Nebraska
U.S. District Court, District of Nebraska

Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Law School Attended

    State University of New York at Buffalo
    Class of 2001
    cum laude

    University Attended

    Southeast Community College, Lincoln, NE
    Class of 1978
    OR Tech Diploma

    Bryan Memorial School of Nursing, Lincoln, NE
    Class of 1984
    Nursing Diploma

    Webster University, Kansas City, MO
    Class of 1992

    St. John Fisher College, Rochester, NY
    Class of 1997
    Nursing Administration, with distinction

    Associations & Memberships

    Member: Nebraska State, New York State and American Bar Associations.

    Bar Fellowship

    and Class Director, Student Bar Association. Recipient: Faculty Choice Award.

    Contact Information


    (402) 474-1507


    Send email to Erin C. Duggan Pemberton

    Office Information
    Erin C. Duggan Pemberton
    Wells Fargo Center 1248 O Street, Suite 800,
    Lincoln, NE 68508-1424


    Wolfe, Snowden, Hurd, Luers & Ahl LLP (Lincoln, Nebraska)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.