Leslie Patterson Vose

Attorney in Lexington, KY
Assistant Attorney General, 1978-1979. Commissioner, Lexington-Fayette County Planning and Zoning, 1992-1999.
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.9 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation
  • Commercial Fraud
  • Civil Rights
  • Insurance Coverage Issues


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

in Litigation, Insurance and Labor and Employment
4.9 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
Analytical Capabilities
Communication Ability
Legal Experience

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 07/07/14
4.8 out of 5.0
great experience, devoted to her clients,
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 06/27/14
5.0 out of 5.0
Ms. Vose is an excellent lawyer who has high ethical standards. I have recommended to prospective clients that she be employed.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 06/27/14
5.0 out of 5.0
Extremely accomplished trial lawyer
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1978, Kentucky

Credit Cards Accepted
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Law School Attended

    University of Kentucky
    Class of 1978

    University Attended

    University of Kentucky
    Class of 1975
    with highest honors

    Birth Information

    Born in 1953
    Louisville, Kentucky, August 6, 1953

    Associations & Memberships

    Fayette County (President, 1989-1990) and Kentucky Bar Associations; Kentucky Bar Foundation (Director, 1990-1991; Civil Jury Instructions Committee, Chair 1991-1992); Kentucky Academy of... More

    Contact Information




    Send email to Leslie Patterson Vose

    Office Information
    Leslie Patterson Vose
     106 West Vine Street, Suite 800,
    Lexington, KY 40507


    Landrum & Shouse LLP (Lexington, Kentucky)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.