Wm. Robert Kaufman

Attorney in Lebanon, OH
City of Lebanon - Board of Zoning Appeals Member; Village of Morrow - Mayor's Court Magistrate; Village of Harveysburg - Mayor's Court Magistrate

Areas of Law

  • Domestic Relations
  • Criminal Defense
  • Probate
  • Juvenile Law
  • Civil Practice


Overall Client Rating

in Appellate Practice, Transportation and Trusts and Estates
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Recommended by 3 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 11/09/13
Posted by a Consumer on 11/09/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Mr. Kaufman was very knowledgeable and professional, while also being personable. I felt very comfortable with him and his staff.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 08/20/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Mr. Kaufman was very professional and showed empathy towards my situation. He did not judge me or make me feel bad/less than I had already felt. He was very knowledgeable and took a disarming approach when requesting required documentation. I appreciate all his help in this matter and will definitely refer my co-workers, friends and family to this practice. Thank Mr. Kaufman and God Bless You!!!!!!
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2001, Ohio, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio and U.S. Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit

Law School Attended

University of Cincinnati College of Law
Class of 2001

University Attended

Miami University
Class of 1994

Birth Information

Born in 1972
Kettering, Ohio, May 7, 1972

Associations & Memberships

Warren County and Ohio State Bar Association

Contact Information






Send email to Wm. Robert Kaufman

Office Information
Wm. Robert Kaufman
 144 East Mulberry Street, P.O. Box 280,
Lebanon, OH 45036


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.