Stovall & Associates

Law Firm in Las Vegas, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site


Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation
  • Medical Malpractice.
  • Personal Injury
 

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Real Estate, Family Law and Personal Injury
3.1 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
3.1
Responsiveness
3.1
Quality of Service
3.1
Value for Money
3.3

  • Data based on 8 reviews
  • Recommended by 5 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 08/17/14
Posted by a Consumer on 02/12/14
2.0 out of 5.0
I had a trip and fall accident on 9/12/13. After contacting the property owner, with no success, I contacted & met w/Justin Stovall on 10/11/13. It took him 3 ½ weeks before he got back to me w/an approved doctors' appointment (Nov 7, 2013), 2 more wks before approval for MRI then 1 more week before I saw the doctor for the diagnosis, Nov. 21, 2013. On Nov 25, 2013 Stovall contacted me by phone to inform me the property owner had no insurance which presented a challenge but he would move forward on my behalf. He said he would contact me after the holidays.

On Jan. 13, 2014 I contacted the medical provider to find out if approval has been given for further treatment. They hadn't heard back from Stovall but would call the firm to find out. Later that day I received a message from the doctor's office informing me Stovall's office claims they never received their request for further treatment and they had to resend their request. It wasn't until Jan. 22, 2014 when I heard back from the doctor's office informing me that a member of the Stovall staff told them that no further treatment will be approved as Stovall has dropped my case! I was horrified!! No member of Stovall's staff EVER contacted me via phone, email or US mail to inform me of this decision! I contacted Justin Stovall via his cell phone, email and business phone asking what was going on. He did contact me via phone within approx 1 hour. He told me that the decision was made by the firm, not him, to drop my case since the property owner had no insurance. He apologized for the way I found out. Apparently this decision was made on Jan. 17, 2014, just before the 3-day holiday and he hadn't had the opportunity to call me.

I am not an idiot! I realize that a case taken on a contingency basis is much different than when one is paying an attorney by the hour. I understand why they dropped my case. What I don't understand is their lack of professionalism in handling my case! If I hadn't initiated 90% of all communication I'd still be sitting here in pain with a torn ligament asking myself, "what do I do now?!"

I wouldn't recommend this firm to get a dog released from the city pound!
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 10/16/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
This firm was very prompt in returning calls, and always accompanied me to court. The case was settled to the satisfaction of both sides.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 08/06/13
Recommended
4.0 out of 5.0
This firm offers clients a Legal Protection Plan that provides several complementary legal services to members of the plan, which I think is a wonderful program especially for clients who are in fixed incomes.
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Related Law Firms
Loading...

Las Vegas, Nevada
702-388-2005 | Email
Client Rating

4.8 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.7 / 5.0



About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.