Robert C. Graham

Attorney in Las Vegas, NV
Phone number not available
View Web Site
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.8 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Trust Law
  • Probate
  • Probate Litigation
  • Business Law
  • Litigation
  • Administrative Law
  • Tax Law
  • Wealth Preservation

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

in Wills and Probate, Trusts and Estates and Guardianship and Conservatorship
4.8 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
4.7
Analytical Capabilities
4.7
Judgment
4.8
Communication Ability
4.8
Legal Experience
4.8

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 03/28/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I have witnessed Mr. Graham in court on multiple occasions and he is an excellent advocate.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 03/20/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I have been an opposing attorney to Rob on a few cases and found hin to be an excellent advocate for his clients, and that he always conducted himself with high standards of professionalism.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 03/12/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Rob has become preeminent in his field
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Managing Senior Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1992, Nevada
1992, U.S. District Court, District of Nevada
1993, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
U.S. Supreme Court


Featured Lawyers
Loading...


Shimon Law Chartered
Las Vegas, U.S.A.
702-312-4175 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.4 / 5.0

Hutchison & Steffen, LLC
Las Vegas, U.S.A.
702-385-2500 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.4 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.