Patricia A. Trent

Attorney in Las Vegas, NV
Recipient, Clark County Bar Association's Volunteer of the Year Award, 1995. Author: Guardianship Chapter, Nevada Civil Practice Manual, 1988, 1993, 2001, 2003, 2005 and 2006. Co-Author: Estate Section of Nevada Civil Practice Manual, 1988. Member, Legislative Revision Committee on Probate and Trusts, 1998 and 2000; included as a top lawyer in the field of Probate in the October, 2014 edition of the Desert Companion magazine.
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

ProbateGuardianship Law
Guardianship Law
Other Areas of Law
Elder Care


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1978, Florida and Nevada

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Stetson University
    Class of 1977

    University Attended

    University of Nevada-Reno
    Class of 1974

    Associations & Memberships

    Clark County Bar Association (Chairman, Guardian Attorneys Program, 1995); State Bar of Nevada (Member: Trust and Probate Committee; Elder Law Section); The Florida Bar.

    Representative Cases

    Matelich v. Matelich, 105 Nev. 203, 772 P.2d 319 (1989).

    Contact Information


    702-382-2210 Call Now




    Send email to Patricia A. Trent

    Office Information
    Patricia A. Trent
     11920 Southern Highlands Parkway, Suite 201,
    Las Vegas, NV 89141-3274


    Trent, Tyrell & Associates (Las Vegas, Nevada)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.