Margo Chernysheva

Attorney in Las Vegas, NV

Peer Rating N/A help_info
  • Immigration Law
  • Immigration Court
  • Immigration Criminal Defense
  • Immigration Services
  • Immigration Waivers
  • Additional Immigration Information
  • Asylum
  • Deportation
  • EB-5Visa Program
  • Employment Immigration
  • Employment-Sponsored Immigration L-1/H-1?H-2
  • Same Sex Couple Immigration
  • Entertainment Visa:O-1/P-1
  • Family Immigration Law
  • Family-Sponsored Immigration
  • Fiance Visas
  • H-1B Visa
  • HR/General Counsel: I-9 Compliance
  • I-601 Waiver of Inadmissibility
  • Investor Visa: E-1/E-2
  • Investor Visa: EB-5
  • L-1, O-1 AND P-1 Visas
  • NAFTA Immigration Services


Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Immigration
4.2 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 10/17/13
Posted by a Consumer on 10/17/13
4.3 out of 5.0
Excellent lawyer
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2009, U.S. District Court, District of Nevada
2009, Nevada Supreme Court, State of Nevada
2010, Supreme Court, State of California

Law School Attended

William S. Boyd School of Law, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada
Class of 2009

University Attended

Quinnipiac University
Class of 1998
summa cum laude, Major: International Business, Minor: Economics

Associations & Memberships

Clark Country and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Nevada; State Bar of California; American Immigration Lawyer Association.

Hobbies & Interests

Music, Hiking, Dog training, family.

Contact Information


702-258-1093 Call Now




Send email to Margo Chernysheva

Office Information
Margo Chernysheva
 6725 Via Austi Avenue, Suite 230,
Las Vegas, NV 89119


MC Law Group (Las Vegas, Nevada)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.