Lawrence J. Semenza, III

Attorney in Las Vegas, NV
Phone number not available
View Web Site
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.8 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Civil Commercial Litigation
  • Civil Rights Litigation
  • Personal Injury Litigation

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

in Litigation, Commercial Law and General Practice
4.8 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
4.9
Analytical Capabilities
4.8
Judgment
4.8
Communication Ability
4.7
Legal Experience
4.7

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 09/18/12
5.0 out of 5.0
Mr. Semenza is a sound lawyer and a man of his word.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 09/16/12
5.0 out of 5.0
Hard-working, capable, and ethical -- an outstanding adviser and advocate.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 09/15/12
5.0 out of 5.0
LJ Semenza is a very fine and upstanding attorney.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 09/11/12
4.6 out of 5.0
Mr. Semenza is a devoted lawyer with a wealth of legal experiance on a wide-ranging variety of cases. He always approaches his clients and opposing counsel with integrity and respect. Mr. Semenza also takes time to assist younger attorneys with their development. I consider him to be both a mentor and a friend.
Report abuse
Posted by a Judge on 09/07/12
5.0 out of 5.0
I HAVE KNOWN L.J. SEMENZA SINCE HIS BIRTH AND WATCHED HIM GROW UP AS HIS FATHER WAS MY EMPLOYER AND LATER LAW PARTNER. L.J. SERVED AS MY JUDICIAL LAW CLERK FOR 2 YEARS AND I HAVE FOLLOWED HIS LEGAL CAREER EVER SINCE. HE ALSO HAS APPEARED IN MY COURT ON A VARIETY OF CASES OVER THE PAST DECADE. I CAN ATTEST TO HIS OUTSTANDING CHARACTER, AND SKILLS AS A LAWYER AND TO HIS OVERALL CITIZENSHIP. HE IS A PERSON AND A LAWYER OF HE HIGHEST STANDARDS AND COMMITMENT.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1999, Nevada and U.S. District Court, District of Nevada
2000, California
2006, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit




About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.