Dale A. Hayes, Jr.

Attorney in Las Vegas, NV

Areas of Law

  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Contract Disputes
  • Personal Injury Litigation
  • Criminal Law
  • Drugs and Narcotics
  • Fraud and Deceit
  • Negligence
  • Personal Injury
  • Premises Liability


Overall Client Rating

in Criminal Law
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 10/14/14
Posted by a Consumer on 10/14/14
5.0 out of 5.0
Dale was totally professional and made sure I was informed every step of the way in my legal matter. I was more than satisfied in the outcome of my case and I recommend them to anyone who needs legal representation that really cares. I've had other lawyers and Dale is a step above the rest!
Report abuse

Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2004, Nevada, U.S. District Court, District of Nevada and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Law School Attended

William S. Boyd School of Law
Class of 2004

University Attended

University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Class of 2001


English, Spanish

Associations & Memberships

National College for DUI Defense.
Licensed Attorney Nevada State Bar.
Clark County Bar Association.
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
Nevada Attorneys fo... More

Hobbies & Interests


Contact Information


702-655-1047 Call Now


(702) 656-0808


Send email to Dale A. Hayes, Jr.

Social Networking

Office Information
Dale A. Hayes, Jr.
 1050 Indigo Drive, Suite 110,
Las Vegas, NV 89145


The Hayes Law Firm (Las Vegas, Nevada)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.