Brent A. Larsen

Attorney in Las Vegas, NV
Winner, First Place, Nathan Burkan Memorial Competition. Associate Editor, Utah Law Review, 1976-1977. Author: Chapters in Nevada Civil Practice Manual, 1st through 5th Editions. Seminar Instructor: Conducting an Effective Cross-Examination, 2000-2004; Boundary Law in Nevada, 2004-2009; Eminent Domain, 2005-2006; Service of Process, 2009; Easement/Encroachment/Setback Issues in Title, 2012.
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.4 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Real Property Law
  • Eminent Domain
  • Probate Litigation
  • Real Estate Transactions
  • Trust Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Business Organization


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

4.4 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1977, Utah
1978, Nevada
U.S. District Court, District of Utah
U.S. District Court, District of Nevada
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
U.S. Supreme Court

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Utah
    Class of 1977

    University Attended

    University of Utah
    Class of 1974

    Associations & Memberships

    Clark County and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Nevada; Utah State Bar; American Inns of Court; American Association for Justice.

    Representative Cases

    Grand Hotel Gift Shop v. Granite State Ins. Co., 108 Nev. 811, 839 P.2d 599 (1992).

    Contact Information






    Send email to Brent A. Larsen

    Office Information
    Brent A. Larsen
     720 South Fourth Street, Suite 300,
    Las Vegas, NV 89101


    Deaner, Malan, Larsen & Ciulla (Las Vegas, Nevada)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.