Aubrey Goldberg

Attorney in Las Vegas, NV
Settlement Judge and Periodic Mediator, Supreme Court, 1997—.
702-358-0438
Free Consultation
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury
  • Workers Compensation Law

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1966, Virginia
1968, Nevada and U.S. District Court, District of Nevada
1985, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Marshall-Wythe School of Law, College of William & Mary
    Class of 1966
    J.D.

    University Attended

    College of William & Mary
    Class of 1963
    B.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1940
    Suffolk, Virginia, December 2, 1940

    Military

    Lt. Col., JAGD, USAF, Reserve, active duty, 1966-1970

    Associations & Memberships

    Clark County (President, 1978; Vice President, 1977; Secretary, 1976; Treasurer, 1975; Chairman, Legal Education Committee, 1979-1990) and American Bar Associations; State Bar of Nevada (Presid... More

    Bar Fellowship

    American College of Trial Lawyers.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    702-384-1616

    Email

    Send email to Aubrey Goldberg


    Office Information
    Aubrey Goldberg
    Member
     601 South Ninth Street,
    Las Vegas, NV 89101-7012

    Loading...

    Logo
    Greenman, Goldberg, Raby & Martinez Professional Corporation (Las Vegas, Nevada)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.