Shoults, Picard & Brooks, LLP

Law Firm in Lapeer, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site


Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Business Law
  • Debt Collection
  • Litigation
  • Real Estate
  • General Civil Trial Practice
  • Labor and Employment
  • Civil Rights
  • Family Law
  • Divorce
  • and Land Use.
  • Personal Injury
  • Criminal Law
  • Contracts
  • Commercial Law
  • Corporate Law
  • Trusts and Estates
  • Estate Planning
  • Zoning
  • Planning
 

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law and Trusts and Estates
3.1 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
3.5
Responsiveness
3.1
Quality of Service
3.0
Value for Money
2.9

  • Data based on 9 reviews
  • Recommended by 4 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 01/14/14
Posted by a Consumer on 01/14/14
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
I felt they answered all of my questions I had and were very professional. Their staff was very helpful and polite when I set up my appointment. I would highly recommend this law firm.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 01/03/13
Recommended
4.8 out of 5.0
I had a good experience with this firm. My calls were always returned and the attorney and her assistant were always up front with me about what was going on and explained the process to me so I knew what was happening. The entire staff was also always professional and seemed very experienced. I have to give them a 4 for a value for the money because I will never like paying money for an attorneys services. However, overall I would highly recommend this firm.
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:



About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.