Matthew D. Norfolk

Attorney in Lake Placid, NY
Assistant District Attorney, Essex County, 2004-2006. Formerly with: Smith, Dwyer and Bliss, P.C.; Condon & Forsyth LLP; Rivkin, Radler & Kremer, LLP; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, Corporate Counsel.
877-548-5190

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Civil Litigation
  • Federal Civil Litigation
  • Trial Practice
  • Civil Appeals
  • Administrative Litigation
  • Civil Rights Section 1983
  • Disabled Access
  • Disabled Rights
  • Residential Real Estate
  • Discrimination
  • Zoning, Planning and Land Use
  • Sports Agency Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Criminal Law
  • Real Estate
  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Real Property Acquisitions

 

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Real Estate, Litigation and General Practice
4.6 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
4.7
Responsiveness
4.4
Quality of Service
4.6
Value for Money
4.5

  • Data based on 14 reviews
  • Recommended by 13 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 04/04/13
Posted by a Consumer on 04/04/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Matt displays a willingness and ability to listen to the client. His understanding of the situation and realization of the best approach in
finding a fair and equitable solution is unmatched.
Report abuse

Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1999, New York
U.S. District Court, Northern, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York
U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington, D.C.

Law School Attended

St. John's University School of Law
Class of 1998
J.D.

University Attended

Cornell University
Class of 1995
B.S.
Natural Resources

Languages

Japanese

Associations & Memberships

Essex County and New York State Bar Associations.

Representative Cases

De George v. Am. Airlines (in Re Air Crash at Belle Harbor), MDL NO. 1448 (RWS), 02 Civ. 4765 (RWS), 2002 U.S. Dist. Lexis 19836 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2002); McCulley v. N.Y.S. Dep't of Envtl. Conservation, 593 F. Supp. 2d 422; 2006 U.S. Dist. Lexis 33748 (N.D.N.Y. May 17, 2006); Grabowski v. Gizzi, 8:07-CV-1242 (LEK/DRH), 2008 U.S. Dist. Lexis 101109... More

Hobbies & Interests

Family, Hunting, Fishing, Lacrosse, Traveling, Fiction writing and Skiing.

Contact Information

Phone

518-523-5555 Call Now

Fax

518-523-5559

Mobile

518-524-6247

Email

Send email to Matthew D. Norfolk

Social Networking



Office Information
Matthew D. Norfolk
Partner
 2296 Saranac Avenue,
Lake Placid, NY 12946-3375

Maintains an office in multiple locations
Loading...

Logo
Briggs Norfolk LLP (Lake Placid, New York)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.