Patrick L. Looper

Attorney in Knoxville, TN
Work History

Private Law Practice - November 2000-;

Police Consultant - January 1992-

Consultant has sixteen years of law enforcement experience and has worked for numerous firms in both public and private sector. Consultant has been testified as an expert in police training, police procedure, and use of force on state and federal level.

Police Academy Instructor, Tennessee Law Enforcement Training Academy State of Tennessee March 1989 - November 2000

Academy Instructor was responsible for training police officers for city, county, and state agencies in the state of Tennessee. Instructor was also responsible development management of many police subjects. Primary duties included the instruction of defensive tactics, physical training, and DUI enforcement. Secondary duties include the instruction of firearms, patrol tactics and stops, traffic accident investigation and legal subjects such as search and seizure and moot court. Instructor has personally trained over 6,000 officers while assigned at the Tennessee Law Enforcement Training Academy.

State Trooper, Tennessee Highway Patrol - State of Tennessee - July 1984 - October 1994

Trooper was responsible for enforcing the laws of the state of Tennessee, with emphasis on traffic laws. Other duties included: Investigation of accidents, Drug interdiction and Drug enforcement, preparation and prosecution of court cases, promotion of highway safety, and maintenance of equipment.

Specialized Training

Tennessee Highway Patrol Recruit School, Instructor Development - Institute of Police Technology and Management, U.S. Department of Justice - FBI Physical Fitness Instructor Certification

PPCT Pressure Point Control Tactics Instructor Certification, PPCT Side-Handle Baton Instructor Certification, PPCT Defensive Tactics Instructor Certification, Smith & Wesson Chemical Weapons Instructor Certification, NRA Firearms Instructor Certification, ASP Tactical Baton Instructor Certification, ISSA Specialist in Sports Conditioning, Aerko International Chemical Weapons Instructor Certification, Glock Inc./Armorer Certification Northwestern Traffic Institute DUI Enforcement Instructor Certification National Judicial College/NHTSA DUI Workshop.

Classes/Seminars Taught: Police Academy Instructor, Tennessee Law Enforcement Training Academy - State of Tennessee, 1989 - 2000

Professional Associations and Memberships: Private Law Practice, 2000-; Police Consultant, 1992-.

865-909-7151

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Business and Commercial Law
  • Business Organizations
  • Criminal Law
  • DUI/DWI
  • Wills
  • Family Law
  • Adoption
  • Child Support
  • Custody and Visitation
  • Divorce
  • Personal Injury Plaintiff
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents Plaintiff

 

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Trusts and Estates and Workers Compensation
4.4 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
4.5
Responsiveness
4.0
Quality of Service
4.5
Value for Money
4.5

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 07/14/12
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 2000, Tennessee
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals

Law School Attended

Nashville School of Law
Class of 2000
J.D.

University Attended

University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Class of 1996
B.S.
magna cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1961

Contact Information

Phone

865-522-3616 Call Now

Email

Send email to Patrick L. Looper


Office Information
Patrick L. Looper
Member
 800 South Gay Street, Suite 2000,
Knoxville, TN 37929

Loading...

Logo
Patrick L. Looper, Attorney at Law (Knoxville, Tennessee)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.