Shelby Serig

Attorney in Jacksonville, FL

Shelby Serig is an Associate in the firm's Jacksonville office. She graduated cum laude from West Virginia University in 1999 with a B.S. in Journalism. While at West Virginia University, she was selected as a member of Gamma Beta Phi, a national academic honorary. She was also selected to serve as a Frasure-Singleton intern with the West Virginia State Legislature. Shelby graduated from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law in 2003. While in law school, she received the Excellence for the Future Award. She was also the winner of the 2003 University of Pittsburgh Client Counseling Competition, the 2003 Mid-Atlantic Client Counseling Competition and placed 6th in the National Client Counseling Competition. Shelby is admitted to practice in Florida and the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida. She practices primarily in the areas of employment practices, premises liability and general civil litigation.

• The Offer of Judgment: Recovering Fees and Costs in Federal Court

(904) 672-4025
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info
  • Employment & Labor
  • Premises Liability
  • General Civil Litigation


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2004, Florida
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida

Law School Attended

University of Pittsburgh School of Law

University Attended

West Virginia University
B.S. in Journalism

Community Contributions

Contact Information


(904) 672-4025


(904) 672-4050


Send email to Shelby Serig

Office Information
Shelby Serig
 4686 Sunbeam Road,
Jacksonville, FL 32257


Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. (Jacksonville, Florida)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.