Catherine Remler Michaud LinkedIn

Attorney in Jacksonville, FL
904-999-0108
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Contracts
  • Commercial Law
  • Probate
  • Business Law
  • Litigation

 

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Real Estate
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 08/20/12
Posted by a Consumer on 08/20/12
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
Catherine was extremely professional, knowledgable, and responsive throughout the entire process. Highly recommend her services. Would plan on utilizing her services for future needs.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Associate

Admission Details

Admitted in 2009, Florida and U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Discover
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Florida Coastal School of Law
    Class of 2009
    J.D.

    University Attended

    Rollins College
    Class of 2004
    B.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1982
    Savannah, Georgia, July 13, 1982

    Associations & Memberships

    Jacksonville Bar Association; The Florida Bar.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    904-355-7000 Call Now

    Email

    Send email to Catherine Remler Michaud


    Office Information
    Catherine Remler Michaud
    Associate
    Modis Building One Independent Drive, Suite 2200,
    Jacksonville, FL 32202-5039

    Loading...

    Logo
    Heekin, Malin & Wenzel, P.A. (Jacksonville, Florida)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.