Feiwell & Hannoy, P.C.

Law Firm in Indianapolis, IN

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.2 of 5

Areas of Law

  • General Civil Practice. Bankruptcy and Creditors' Rights
  • Real Estate and Foreclosure
  • Administrative
  • General Business and Commercial Law.

Peer Rating


Average Peer Rating

Based on this firm's rated lawyers
4.2 out of 5.0
  • Lawyers rated at this firm meet very high criteria of general ethical standards
4.4 out of 5.0
4.4 out of 5.0
2.9 out of 5.0
4.4 out of 5.0
5.0 out of 5.0

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:

Firm Details

Year Established


Firm Size


Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available

America's Servicing, Aurora Home Loans, Bank of America, Cenlar Mortgage, Chase Home Loans, LLC, Citimortgage, Countrywide Home Loans, EMC Mortgage Corporation, Equity One, Everhome, Federal National Mortgage Association, Fidelity Foreclosure Solutions, Fifth Third Bank, First American National Default, GMAC Mortgage Corp., Homecomings Financial, Interbay Funding, Key Home Equity, Land America Default Services, Litton Loan Services, M & T Mortgage Corp., National City Mortgage, Option One, PHH Mortgage Corp., Regions Financial, Select Portfolio, The Veterans Administration, Washington Mutual Bank, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Wilshire Credit Corp. References: Fifth Third Bank and National Bank of Indianapolis.

Contact Information

Firm Address

Feiwell & Hannoy, P.C.
251 North Illinois Street, Suite 1700, P.O. Box 44141,
Indianapolis, IN 46244-0141






Send email to Feiwell & Hannoy, P.C.

Office Information
 251 North Illinois Street, Suite 1700, P.O. Box 44141,
Indianapolis, IN 46244-0141


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.