DeLaney & DeLaney LLC LinkedIn

Law Firm in Indianapolis, IN

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

About This Firm

DeLaney & DeLaney is a litigation firm which provides services to a wide variety of clients in nearly all types of civil litigation. Each of the firm's partners has earned Martindale-Hubbell's highest rating for both professional competence and ethics. Together, the firm's lawyers have more than 60 years of trial practice experience. This includes nearly two years of actual time in front of juries DeLaney & DeLaney is certified as a Women's Business Enterprise (WBE) by the Women's Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC), the City of Indianapolis and the State of Indiana.

Reported Cases: Harewski v. Guidant Corp, 489 F 3d 799 (7th Cir 2007); Americans for the Arts v. Ruth Lilly Charitable Remainder Annuity Trust #1, 855 N.E 2d 592 (Ind. Ct App 2006); Leaf v. Shelnutt, 400 F 3d 1070 (7th Cir 2005); Hickman v. Hickman (In re Hickman), 805 N E 2d 808 (Ind. Ct App 2004), trans den 822 N E.2d 979 (Ind 2004); Hirata Corp v. J B Oxford & Co, 193 F R D 589 (S D Ind 2000); Bamberger & Feibleman v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co, 665 N E 2d 933 (Ind. Ct App. 1996); Corll v. Edward D Jones & Co, 646 N.E 2d 721 (Ind Ct App 1995); Edward D Jones & Co v. Cole, 643 N E 2d 402 (Ind. Ct App 1994); State ex rel Corll v. Wabash Circuit Court, 631 N E 2d 914 (Ind 1994); Brougher Agency v. united Home Life Ins Co, 622 N E.2d 1013 (Ind Ct. App. 1993); INB National Bank v. Moran Electric Service, Inc 608 N.E.2d 702 (Ind Ct App 1993).

Areas of Law

  • Employment Litigation
  • Litigation
  • Products Liability Litigation
  • Media Law
  • Election Law
  • Business Law
  • Fraud
  • ERISA Litigation Arbitration matters.
  • Breach of Contract
  • Contract Negotiation
  • Securities
  • Medical Negligence Litigation
  • Commercial Disputes
  • Estate Related controversies
  • Probate Litigation

Peer Rating


Average Peer Rating

Based on this firm's rated lawyers
5.0 out of 5.0
  • Lawyers rated at this firm meet very high criteria of general ethical standards
5.0 out of 5.0
Managing Partner
5.0 out of 5.0
5.0 out of 5.0

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:
Managing Partner

Firm Details

Year Established


Firm Size


Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available

English, French and Russian.


Indianapolis Airport Authority, Cole Lawyer Trumble Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Magic Circle Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, St. Francis Hospital & Health Centers, Inc., National City Bank, Indianapolis Housing Agency, MDG International and Inc.

Contact Information

Firm Address

DeLaney & DeLaney LLC
3646 North Washington Blvd.,
Indianapolis, IN 46205

Phone 1

317-644-6246 Call firm now

Phone 2





Send email to DeLaney & DeLaney LLC

Office Information
 3646 North Washington Blvd.,
Indianapolis, IN 46205


Office Hours
08:30 AM- 05:00 PM
08:30 AM- 05:00 PM
08:30 AM- 05:00 PM
08:30 AM- 05:00 PM
08:30 AM- 05:00 PM

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.