David J. Steele

Attorney in Indianapolis, IN
Phone number not available
View Web Site

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Auto Accident Law
  • Child Custody Law
  • Child Support Law
  • Civil Law
  • Divorce Law
  • Family Law
  • Malpractice Law
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Collaborative Family Law
  • Divorce
  • Divorce Arbitration
  • Divorce Mediation
  • Community Property Law
  • Divorce Taxation
  • Domestic Relations
  • Domestic Torts
  • Equitable Distribution
  • Family Arbitration
  • Family Mediation
  • International Family Law
  • Interstate Support
  • Legal Separation Agreements
  • Marital Agreements
  • Marital Property Distribution
  • Marital Property Law
  • Marital Property Settlements
  • Matrimonial Law
  • Military Divorce
  • Name Changes
  • No Fault Divorce
  • Non-Traditional Family Law
  • Paternity
  • Post Divorce Modification
  • Postnuptial Agreements
  • Premarital Agreements
  • Qualified Domestic Relations Orders
  • Restraining Orders
  • Spousal Support
  • Uncontested Divorce
  • Children
  • Adoption Law
  • Child Custody
  • Child Custody Mediation
  • Child Support
  • Fathers Rights
  • Childrens Rights
  • Grandparents Custody
  • Grandparents Visitation Rights
  • Independent Adoptions
  • International Adoptions
  • Interstate Adoptions
  • Interstate Child Custody
  • Parental Rights
  • Parenting Time
  • Private Adoptions
  • Step Parent Adoptions
  • Termination of Parental Rights
  • Third Party Custody
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Birth Trauma
  • Cosmetic Surgery Malpractice
  • Dental Malpractice
  • Dental Malpractice Defense
  • Chiropractors Malpractice
  • Failure to Diagnose
  • Gynecology Malpractice
  • Medical Negligence
  • Medical Malpractice Defense
  • Medical Liability
  • Medical-Legal Law
  • Medication Errors
  • Mental Health Professionals Malpractice
  • Nursing Liability
  • Nursing Malpractice
  • Nursing Negligence
  • Obstetric Malpractice
  • Oncology Law
  • Optometric Malpractice
  • Orthopedic Malpractice
  • Pediatric Malpractice
  • Pharmacists Liability
  • Podiatric Malpractice
  • Surgeons Liability
  • Wrong Site Surgery
  • Workers Compensation
  • Personal Injury
  • Accidents
  • Animal Attacks
  • Aquatic Injuries
  • Automobile Accidents and Injuries
  • Automobile Negligence
  • Bicycle Accidents
  • Boating Accidents
  • Bodily Injury
  • Brain Injury
  • Bus Accidents
  • Catastrophic Injury
  • Commercial Vehicle Liability
  • Cumulative Trauma
  • Dog Bites
  • Electrical Injury
  • Electromagnetic Field Litigation
  • Head Injury
  • Motor Vehicle Accidents and Injuries
  • Motorcycle Accidents
  • Neurolaw
  • Pedestrian Injuries
  • Personal Injury Mediation
  • Plaintiffs Personal Injury
  • Power Line Contact Injury
  • Rental Vehicle Litigation
  • Repetitive Stress Injury
  • School Bus Accidents
  • Severe Burns
  • Slip and Fall
  • Spinal Injury
  • Third Party Wrongful Death
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Whiplash
  • Wrongful Death

 

Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Family Law
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 4 reviews
  • Recommended by 4 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 08/28/13
Posted by a Consumer on 08/28/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
DAVID STEELE IS THE BEST DIVORCE ATTY IN INDIANA! Extremely sharp, totally committed, he promises that he has your back and HE DOES! He made short work of an incredibly dragged out process from my ex and her atty, was a force to be reckoned with (and feared by opposing counsel). He is extremely compassionate. My finances were savaged by my ex and David was VERY accommodating in his billing. No other atty I know would do that. A TOTALLY SUPERIOR DIVORCE ATTY! IF YOU WANT RESULTS USE DAVID STEELE!
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 01/15/13
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
It was immediately clear that David's main concern was winning. It was not money. This was my first time using the legal system and I was nervous and clueless. David couldn't have been more patient and I doubt he could have been more knowledgable. He got everything possible for me out of my divorce which wasn't exactly amicable. He did it while keeping everything friendly and never charged me a dime over my initial retainer. He could have run my bill up but instead, cheated to keep it low.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 12/09/12
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
I contacted David Steele along with probably 20 other lawyers about a child custody case. I couldn't get hardly ANY attorneys to even email me back with even a direction on where to go with my case without paying at least $1000 before even talking at all. Not only was he one of the ONLY attorneys to contact me back, he emailed me at 1am on his own time explaining EVERYTHING that had to do with my case. He was absolutely AMAZING and well worth the money. I'd recommend him to anyone. He's the man!
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 12/02/12
Recommended
5.0 out of 5.0
I contacted David to help me with a custody arraignment. He spent a great deal of time talking with me, and explained everything in detail. David was very knowledgeable on the custody laws, and helped me understand what my expectations should be as the non custodial parent. He was always available when I called, even giving me his cell phone number. He even returned a call to me after he had dental surgery. I am very happy with the work David did for me.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 2003, Indiana
U.S. District Court, Southern and Northern Districts of Indiana


Featured Lawyers
Loading...


Broyles Kight & Ricafort P.C.
Indianapolis, U.S.A.
317-571-3600 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

Harden Jackson, LLC
Carmel, U.S.A.
317-660-8082 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

5.0 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.