Lawyers.com > Find a Lawyer > Christopher-C-Murray
Help

Christopher C. Murray

LinkedIn Christopher C. Murray 0 0 reviews - Read Reviews or Write a Review
Christopher C. Murray is a Lawyer in Indianapolis, Indiana

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a review
Peer Rating N/A help_info
317-916-2522
View Web Site

About This Lawyer

Articles Editor, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 2000-2001. Law Clerk, Honorable Fred I. Parker, Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Contributing Editor, ABA/BNA Fair Labor Standards Act Treatise, 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 Supplements. Chapter Editor (Wage and Hour Requirements), Indiana Employment Law Handbook — Sixth Edition, Indiana Chamber of Commerce (2008). Co-Author: with Brian L. McDermott, "A Primer On Workplace Bullying," published in the DRI's For the Defense (April 2008), and reprinted in The Update, a publication of the San Diego Defense Lawyers (Fall 2008); with Ashish S. Prasad, "Review of the Proposed Changes to the ABA Civil D... View more More

Areas of Law

  • Litigation

    Contact Information

    Phone

    317-916-2522

    Fax

    317-916-9076

    Email

    Send email to Christopher C. Murray

    Website
     

    Experience & Credentials

    Position

    Shareholder

    Admission Details

    Admitted in 2002, Illinois
    2003, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois and U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    2004, U.S. District Court, Southern and Central Districts of Illinois, and U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    2005, U.S. District Court, Northern and Southern Districts of Indiana
    2006, Indiana and U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio
    2011, U.S. District Court, Western District of Tennessee and U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
    2012, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

    Law School Attended

    University of Pennsylvania Law School
    Class of 2001
    J.D.

    University Attended

    Case Western Reserve University
    Class of 1993
    B.A.

    Associations & Memberships

    Indianapolis (Chair Elect, Executive Committee of the Labor and Employment Section), Indiana State and American (Member, Employment Law Section) Bar Associations.

    Representative Cases

    New York New York, LLC v. NLRB, 676 F.3d 193 (D.C. Cir. 2012) (amicus); Zusy v. International Medical Group, Inc., 500 F.Supp.2d 1087 (S.D. Ind. 2007); Davis v. VanNatta, 438 F.3d 707 (7th Cir. 2006); Griffin v. Sisters of Saint Francis, Inc., 489 F.3d 838 (7th cir. 2006); Phillips v. City of Bloomington, 869 N.E.2d 1281 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007).
    Office Information
    Christopher C. Murray
    Suite 4600, 111 Monument Circle,
    Indianapolis, IN 46204
    U.S.A.
    Loading...

    Logo
    Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. (Indianapolis, Indiana)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.