Anthony M. Totta

Attorney in Independence, MO
The Order of Barristers. Recipient: Fred L. Howard Award for Excellence in Appellate Advocacy; American Jurisprudence Awards in Advanced Business Organizations and Estates and Trusts II.

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Traffic Violations
  • Drivers License Suspension
  • Driving While Intoxicated
  • Drug Crimes
  • Personal Injury Law
  • Hit and Run
  • Misdemeanors
  • Assault and Battery
  • Domestic Violence
  • Parole and Probation
  • Shoplifting


Overall Client Rating

in Criminal Law, Family Law and General Practice
4.7 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 9 reviews
  • Recommended by 8 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 11/22/12
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1993, Missouri and U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri
1994, Kansas and U.S. District Court, District of Kansas

Law School Attended

University of Missouri at Columbia
Class of 1993

University Attended

University of Missouri at Columbia
Class of 1990

Birth Information

Born in 1968
Kansas City, Missouri, 1968

Associations & Memberships

Kansas City Metropolitan and Eastern Jackson County (Member, Board of Directors) Bar Associations; The Missouri Bar; Missouri Association of Trial Attorneys; The Association of Trial Lawyers o... More

Contact Information


816-252-2332 Call Now




Send email to Anthony M. Totta

Office Information
Anthony M. Totta
 19049 E. Valley View Parkway, Suite B,
Independence, MO 64055-7026


Law Offices of Anthony M. Totta, LLC (Independence, Missouri)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.