Stephen A. Mendel

Attorney in Houston, TX
Registered Architect, Texas. Licensed Real Estate Broker, Texas. Briefing Attorney, U.S. District Court, Judge Hugh Gibson, Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division 1987-1989. Co-Author, "Guiding Those Left Behind," 2006. Contributing Author: "Total Wealth Management," 2004; "Love, Money & Control," 2002; "Strictly Business," 2002. Co-Author: "Recent Court Decisions in Admiralty Law: 1990-1991," presented to the Greater New Orleans Barge Fleeting Association; "Recent Decisions in Admiralty Law: 1992-1993". Author, "Negligent Infliction of Mental Distress Upon A Bystander In Texas," 26 S. Tex. L.J. 305, 1985. Faculty Member, College of Technology, University of Houston, Central Campus, 1981-1987 (taught courses on construction contract documents; voted 1985 Teacher of the Year by the Students in Construction Related Industries).
281-759-3213
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Family Limited Partnerships
  • Asset Protection
  • Admiralty and Maritime Law
  • Estate Planning
  • Contracts
  • Commercial Real Estate
  • Residential Real Estate
  • Collections
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Consumer Law
  • Construction Law
  • Trusts and Estates
  • Contract Fraud
  • Contract Litigation
  • Labor and Employment
  • Personal Injury
  • Mediation
  • Arbitration
  • Business Planning
  • Wills
  • Trust Law
  • Trust Administration
  • Probate

 

Overall Client Rating

in Trusts and Estates and General Practice
3.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
3.0
Responsiveness
3.0
Quality of Service
3.0
Value for Money
3.0

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 11/01/13
Posted by a Consumer on 11/01/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I first met Steve at a seminar on estate planning 20 years ago. He impressed me with his expertise and demeanor. I since used him for my personal wills and estate planning. He is knowledgeable, personable, responsive, and very reasonably priced. I frequently recommend him to others and have heard nothing but good things from everyone I've sent his way.
Report abuse
Posted by a Small Business on 06/18/13
1.0 out of 5.0
Awful experience overall. He never followed on any of the traced strategies that would have made our case an open/close case, and let the case evolve all against us by not doing anything agreed on the expensive meetings regarding the case, at the end we end up paying not only the amount that we got sue for but also both attorneys expenses, a total of 200% of the amount in dispute. We contacted the Houston Bar for mediation and he declined any participation. We would never personally recommend hi
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1987, Texas, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, U.S. District Court, Southern and Northern Districts of Texas and U.S. Supreme Court

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    South Texas College of Law
    Class of 1986
    J.D.
    summa cum laude

    University Attended

    University of Texas
    Class of 1977
    B. Arch.
    with high honors

    Birth Information

    Born in 1953
    Galveston, Texas, December 23, 1953

    Associations & Memberships

    Houston Bar Association; State Bar of Texas.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    281-759-3213 Call Now


    Office Information
    Stephen A. Mendel
    Member
     1155 Dairy Ashford, Suite 104,
    Houston, TX 77079

    Loading...

    Logo
    The Mendel Law Firm, L.P. (Houston, Texas)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.