Mr. Gary A. Hinchman

Attorney in Houston, TX
Phone number not available
View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Family Law


    Client Rating

    Overall Client Rating

    in Family Law
    1.0 out of 5.0

    Communication Ability
    Quality of Service
    Value for Money

    • Data based on 2 reviews
    • Last reviewed on 11/17/14
    Posted by a Consumer on 11/17/14
    1.0 out of 5.0
    I hired Mr. Hinchman back in January of 2014 to represent me in my divorce. I have seen him a total of 2 times. The first time was for my consultation, at which point I decided to hire Mr. Hinchman to represent me so I gave him half of the money he required. The second time was about a week later when I met with him outside his office building to pay the remaining balance. After this meeting I did not hear from him and I was not able to reach him for months. Finally around June I was able to reach his assistant, that I never knew he had, or maybe he didn't when I retained his services. Thankfully she would at least answer the phone and communicate with me via text and email. However, anytime I wanted to speak to or see Mr. Hinchman it was a problem and she made excuses saying he was super busy. I asked for her to schedule a meeting numerous times at his office, only for her to make more excuses. I finally figured out when she told me numerous times that I could probably catch him at his favorite bar, that he doesn't even have an office anymore. I needed someone who was accessible to me, and someone professional that I didn't have to track down at a bar. Who would want to discuss their divorce case in such a public setting?!
    Mr. Hinchman never checked on my case and had no idea who I was when I finally threatened to his assistant to terminate his services, and she called me from a bar. He asked my name, and then handed the phone back to his assistant, who then asked me to log into the Harris County District Clerk's website from my computer because she could not access it on her phone. This is when I found all of the things I did not know, because Mr. Hinchman had not been looking into my case and keeping me updated. At this point I decided to terminate his services and asked for my money back. After days of pressuring his assistant and her telling me about them arguing on the phone and how he yelled at her so she hung up on him, she finally was able to talk to him herself, and relayed to me that he would give no refund. Although he never did one thing for me, not even answered a phone call.
    Please don't waste your time, like I wasted mine. Or better yet, like Gary Hinchman wasted my time. It's nearly a year later and I've had to hire a new attorney, and forget about the money I've given to Mr. Hinchman. I've been told by my new attorney that the only way I could possibly get my money back would be to sue Mr. Hinchman, but that would end up costing me more than what I paid him, so what's the point? I also found after researching Gary Hinchman on the State Bar of Texas website under the Public Disciplinary History information that as of 10/3/14 he received a Public Reprimand from the State Bar.
    Please beware. Do not give money to Gary Hinchman.
    Report abuse
    Posted by a Consumer on 11/30/13
    1.0 out of 5.0
    Hinchman cashed my check immediately but three months in has not provided any documents and nothing has been filed. He refuses to return phone calls and has been a no show for two meetings. He was sent certified mail requested a refund and return of our file and he still does not respond. He is a shame to the profession and I am embarrassed to have ever been involved with a person of this caliber.
    Report abuse

    Experience & Credentials



    Admission Details

    Admitted in 1984, Texas

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.