Dick DeGuerin

Attorney in Houston, TX
Delta Theta Phi. Author: "Border Searches in the Fifth Circuit; Or a Case of Occlusive Trees," Voice for the Defense, Fall, 1974 (Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's Publication); "The Current Status of Border Search in the Fifth Circuit," For the Defense, Harris County Criminal Lawyer's Association Publications, Fall 1974. Speaker: "Capital Murder in Texas," San Antonio Criminal Law Institute, 1976; "Double Jeopardy," San Antonio Criminal Law Institute, April, 1984; "The War on Crime: A War on the Sixth Amendment," San Antonio Criminal Law Institute, April, 1985. Outstanding Criminal Defense Lawyer of the Year, 1994; "Texas' Best Criminal Defense Attorney", Texas Monthly, 1994; "Houston's Most Famous Defense Attorney", RO Magazine, 1995; Attorney of the Year, Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association, 1999; One of the Top Ten Lawyers in Harris County in the Past 100 Years, Houston Chronicle, 1999; Hall of Fame Award, Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, 2004; Lifetime Achievement Award, Harris County Criminal Lawyers Association, 2008; Top Attorneys in Texas, Texas Monthly, 2008. Assistant District Attorney, Harris County, Texas, 1965-1968. Associate, Trial Division, Butler, Binion, Rice, Cook & Knapp, 1968-1971; Associate, Foreman & DeGuerin (Percy Foreman and Dick DeGuerin), 1971-1982; Adjunct Professor of Law, South Texas College of Law (Criminal Law), 1969-1970; Adjunct Professor Law, The University of Texas School of Law (Criminal Law), 1994—).
713-223-5959
Free Consultation

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • White Collar Crime
  • Appellate Law

 

Overall Client Rating

in Criminal Law
4.8 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
4.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 01/05/11
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials

Position

Owner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1965, Texas
1968, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas
1971, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court
1973, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
1974, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eight Circuit
1979, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas
1981, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
1982, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit and U.S. District Court, District of Michigan
1983, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
1984, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
1985, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    The University of Texas School of Law
    Class of 1965
    LL.B.

    University Attended

    The University of Texas at Austin
    Class of 1963
    B.A.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1941
    Austin, Texas, February 16, 1941

    Associations & Memberships

    American Bar Association; American Board of Trial Advocates; American College of Trial Lawyers, Fellow; American Judicature Society, Charter Member; American Trial Lawyers Association; Bar Associ... More

    Certifications

    (Board Certified, Criminal Law, Texas Board Of Legal Specialization)

    Bar Fellowship

    American Bar Foundation; American Board of Criminal Lawyers; American College of Trial Lawyers; Texas Bar Foundation.

    Contact Information

    Phone

    713-223-5959

    Fax

    713-223-9231

    Email

    Send email to Dick DeGuerin


    Office Information
    Dick DeGuerin
    Owner
    Seventh Floor, The Republic Building 1018 Preston Avenue,
    Houston, TX 77002-1818

    Loading...

    Logo
    DeGuerin Dickson Hennessy & Ward (Houston, Texas)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.