Audra L. Schwartz

Attorney in Hackensack, NJ
Author: "What You Need To Know about Construction Liens," New Jersey Lawyer, 10 NJL 1400, July 23, 2001 (with Thomas J. Fellig).

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Business Transactions and Disputes
  • Employment Litigation and Advising
  • Construction Law
  • Commercial Real Estate Transactions and Litigation
  • Estate Litigation


Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Contracts, Labor and Employment and Corporate Law
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 4 reviews
  • Recommended by 4 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 06/03/13
Posted by a Small Business on 05/23/13
Audra is an excellent listener and a quick study. She hears what you say and is adept and translating the law into user-friendly terms. She has a keen business sense and is able to address issues that you might have overlooked.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1994, New Jersey and New York
1997, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
2000, U.S. District Court, Southern and Eastern Districts of New York

Law School Attended

Pace University School of Law
Class of 1993

University Attended

Lafayette College
Class of 1990

Associations & Memberships

New Jersey State and American Bar Associations.

Contact Information


201-996-0024 Call Now




Send email to Audra L. Schwartz

Social Networking

Office Information
Audra L. Schwartz
Continental Plaza II 411 Hackensack Avenue, 4th Floor,
Hackensack, NJ 07601


Fellig Schwartz, LLC (Hackensack, New Jersey)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.