Carl Robton Perelli-Minetti

Attorney in Greenwich, CT
Member: Greenwich, New York State, Connecticut and American Bar Associations; The Association of the Bar of the City of New York.
203-344-9292 direct
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Corporate Law
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • International Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Joint Ventures
  • International Joint Ventures
  • Private Equity
  • Limited Liability Company Law
  • Closely Held Corporations
  • S Corporations
  • International Corporate Law
  • Corporate Control Contests
  • Executive Compensation
  • Employee Severance and Termination
  • Equity Compensation
  • Entertainment Contracts
  • Corporate Formation
  • Corporate Governance
  • Corporate Partnerships
  • Corporate Organization
  • Corporate Reorganization
  • Pre-Bankruptcy Workouts
  • Corporate Workouts
  • Out of Court Debt Restructuring
  • Commercial Workouts
  • Small Business Corporations
  • Deferred Compensation
  • General Practice
  • Nonprofit and Charitable Organizations
  • Art Law


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1983, New York
1992 Connecticut

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Law School Attended

University of California at Los Angeles
Class of 1981

University Attended

Virginia Military Institute

University of California at Santa Barbara
Class of 1970

University of California at Santa Barbara
Class of 1972

Birth Information

Born in 1948
Petaluma, California, August 12, 1948




Lieutenant, U.S. Army, 1976-1978

Contact Information

Phone 1

203-344-9292 direct

Fax 1




Phone 2


Fax 2

203-698-1759 direct


Send email to Carl Robton Perelli-Minetti

Office Information
Carl Robton Perelli-Minetti
 125 Mason Street,
Greenwich, CT 06830-6605


Singer, Anner & Perelli-Minetti, LLP (Greenwich, Connecticut)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.