Don Pilzer

Attorney in Greenville, SC
Recipient, Better Business Bureau Chairman's Award for Outstanding Community Service, 2001. Former Member, Board of Directors, United Ministries.
Free Consultation

Areas of Law

  • Social Security Disability
  • Social Security


Overall Client Rating

in Social Security and Bankruptcy
4.4 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 12 reviews
  • Recommended by 10 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 09/10/14
Posted by a Consumer on 10/29/13
5.0 out of 5.0
I had an extremely difficult disability case and everyone in the firm was wonderful in getting all the needed documents or making phone calls to win my case. I am beyond pleased with them; friendly, professional and helpful with all my questions trying to understand exactly what was going to happen.
Thank you Pilzer Group.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 09/13/13
4.3 out of 5.0
The office staff at times was not as knowledgeable as I thought they should be
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1980, Illinois
1981, South Carolina
1982, Georgia

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    Duke University
    Class of 1980

    University Attended

    Northwestern University
    Class of 1977

    Birth Information

    Born in 1955
    Gary, Indiana, August 8, 1955



    Associations & Memberships

    South Carolina Bar (Member, Social Security Disability Section); State Bar of Georgia; National Organization of Social Security Claimants' Representatives (Sustaining Member); South Carolina Trial L... More

    Contact Information




    Send email to Don Pilzer

    Office Information
    Don Pilzer
     300 University Ridge, Suite 100,
    Greenville, SC 29601-3645


    Don Pilzer, PC (Greenville, South Carolina)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.