Alan R. Cochran

Attorney in Greenville, SC
Society of Wig and Robe; Phi Alpha Delta. Secretary, 2001, Vice President, 1999-2001, President, 2002-2003, Executive Board, 2006-2010, and Member, South Carolina Injured Workers' Advocates. Listed in: Outstanding Lawyers of America; National Register's Who's Who in Executives & Professionals, 2004; The Best Lawyers in America, 2004-2012; Martindale-Hubbell Bar Registry of Preeminent Lawyers, 2011.
864-235-8163
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Workers Compensation
  • Personal Injury
  • Automobile Accidents

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1978, South Carolina

Law School Attended

University of South Carolina
Class of 1978
J.D.

University Attended

Furman University
Class of 1975
B.A.
summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa

Birth Information

Born in 1953
Greenville, South Carolina, January 3, 1953

Associations & Memberships

Greenville County Bar, South Carolina Bar, and American Bar Associations; South Carolina Injured Workers' Advocates; South Carolina Association for Justice; American Association for Justice.... More

Contact Information

Phone

864-235-8163

Email

Send email to Alan R. Cochran


Office Information
Alan R. Cochran
Member
 1617 East North Street,
Greenville, SC 29607

Loading...

Logo
Cochran Law Firm, P.A. (Greenville, South Carolina)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.