Charles E. Coble

Attorney in Greensboro, NC

Charles Coble represents clients in a wide range of complex commercial litigation. He has successfully represented businesses and individuals in a host of settings, including complex business disputes, class actions, First Amendment and other media litigation, copyright infringement claims, employment law claims, including covenants not to compete, construction disputes, and North Carolina Business Court litigation. His practice includes trial court and appellate work at both the state and federal level. He has experience trying arbitrations ranging in scope from single-day to multi-week hearings, and he has both tried cases to jury and argued appeals in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, the North Carolina Supreme Court, and the North Carolina Court of Appeals. He has argued numerous contested motions in North Carolina Superior Court and in the North Carolina Business Court.

Charles has special experience in communications and media law, primarily in representing broadcast, print, and other media clients in First Amendment and other media litigation. He has successfully represented clients defending against libel, defamation, and privacy claims, prosecuting Open Meetings Law, Public Records Act, and courtroom access cases and claims, and resisting subpoenas directed to reporters and media organizations.

Charles authors Brooks Pierce's Newsroom Law Blog and regularly speaks to journalists, public officials, students, and practitioners on these topics.

He is proficient in German.

Representative Cases with Published or Reported Decisions

· News and Observer et al. v. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority. Represented local and national newspapers in federal case concerning placement of newsracks in airport terminal buildings. District Court entered judgment in favor of newspapers, along with an award of attorneys' fees, both of which were affirmed by U.S. Court of Appeals for Fourth Circuit. Published decisions at 597 F.3d 570 (4th Cir. 2010) and 588 F. Supp. 2d. 653 (E.D.N.C. 2008).

· Beaufort County Board of Education v. Beaufort County Board of Commissioners. Represented local television station in challenge to gag order entered by trial court in high profile trial. On appeal, North Carolina Court of Appeals struck gag order as unconstitutional and admonished trial judge. Published decision at 184 N.C. App. 110 (2007).

· Corr Services, Inc. v. Davidson County. Represented small business in lawsuit against county over services contract. North Carolina Business Court entered summary judgment in favor of small business. Reported decision at 2004 NCBC 6, 2004 WL 2413420 (N.C. Super. Ct. Sept. 30, 2004).

· SEANC v. N.C. Department of Treasury. Represented broadcast and press associations as amici curiae in public records dispute. Was allowed argument time before North Carolina Supreme Court, which reversed decision of North Carolina Court of Appeals as urged by amici curiae. Published decision at 364 N.C. 205 (2010).

· Dutcher v. Eastburn. Represented publisher and author in libel case removed to federal court. District Court entered order dismissing case for lack of personal jurisdiction. Reported decision at 39 Media Law Reporter 1605, 2011 WL 1134666 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 26, 2011).

· Kirkman v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. Represented defendant in putative class action pending in federal court. District Court denied class certification and entered summary judgment for defendant. Published decision at 220 F.R.D. 49 (M.D.N.C. 2004) and reported decision at 2006 WL 544303 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2003).

Honors & Awards

· Recognized as a member of North Carolina's "Legal Elite" in the Young Guns category by Business North Carolina magazine, 2011-12

· Recognized by North Carolina Super Lawyers as a Rising Star in Administrative Law and Business Litigation, 2010-12

Professional & Community Activities

· Chairman, Raleigh Board of Adjustment, March 2012--

· Vice-Chairman, Raleigh Board of Adjustment, July 2009 - March 2012

· Member, Raleigh Board of Adjustment, November 2007--

· Community Member, Wake County Board of Education Audit Committee, May 2012--

· Member, North Carolina Bar Association, 1999--

· Member, American Bar Association, 1999--

· Member, Wake County Bar Association, 1999--

· Member, Federal Bar Association, Eastern District of North Carolina, 2012--

Articles, Publications & Speeches

· Author, Brooks Pierce's Newsroom Law Blog, 2008--

· "Online Speech and the First Amendment: Internet Defamation and other Digital Torts," University of North Carolina Festival of Legal Learning, February 2013

· "AIA Continuing Education Seminar, Risk Management," American Institute of Architects, Triangle Section, October 2012

· "Full-Disclosure" Workshops on N.C. Public Records Act and FOIA, organized by Carolina Public Press at Western Carolina University and UNC-Asheville, March 2012

· Panelist, "Newsgathering Law: How to Stay Out of Trouble When You're Gathering Information for a Story," Online Media Legal Network, September 2010

· Panelist, "How Much Do You Really Make? Applying the New Rules on Disclosure of Public Officials' Compensation," Sunshine Center of the North Carolina Open Government Coalition, March 2009

· "A Legal Primer for Architects: Liability Risks and Contract Issues," AIA Triangle Seminar at the NC State School of Design, August 2008

· "Newsroom Seminar," WRAL-TV, July 2006

· "What You Need to Know About Public Records and Open Meetings," Research Triangle Park, March 2006

· Panelist, "Open Meetings in North Carolina," University of North Carolina Festival of Legal Learning, February 2006

· "Libel: Revisiting the Not-So-Obvious," Virginia Press Association, January 2006


· Brooks Pierce Lawyers Recognized in The Best Lawyers in America® 2014

· Brooks Pierce Partners Successful in Pro Bono Taser Case

· Brooks Pierce Attorneys Named Super Lawyers, North Carolina Super Lawyers

· Brooks Pierce's Newsroom Law Blog


Law Clerk to Judge Frank W. Bullock, Jr., U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina, 1998-1999

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Appellate Litigation
  • Media, Communications and Technology
  • Entertainment Law
  • Intellectual Property and Technology
  • Labor and Employment
  • Construction


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1998, North Carolina
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit
U.S. District Court, Eastern District, North Carolina
U.S. District Court, Middle District, North Carolina
U.S. District Court, Western District, North Carolina
U.S. District Court, Northern District, Florida

Law School Attended

Class of 1998
magna cum laude

University Attended

Yale University
Class of 1995
magna cum laude

Birth Information

Born in 1972
October 30, 1972

Contact Information

Office Information
Charles E. Coble
2000 Renaissance Plaza 230 North Elm Street,
Greensboro, NC 27401

Maintains an office in multiple locations

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P. (Greensboro, North Carolina)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.