Burton, Sue & Anderson, L.L.P.

Law Firm in Greensboro, NC

About This Firm

Established in 1996, Burton, Sue & Anderson, L.L.P. devotes 90% of its practice to General Insurance Defense. The firm represents a wide diversity of state and nationwide clients, and is listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.

Areas of Law

  • General Practice. Trials in all State and Federal Courts. Negligence
  • Automobile
  • Workers' Compensation
  • Medical
  • Surety and General Insurance Defense Practice.
  • Legal and Professional Malpractice
  • Products Liability
  • Fire
  • Casualty

Overall Client Rating

in General Practice
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 02/11/11
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:

Firm Details

Year Established


Firm Size


State Bar Summary

All attorneys are members of the Greensboro, North Carolina Bar Associations and the North Carolina State Bar.


Alliance Mutual Insurance Co., Allstate Insurance Co., American Auto Club, CIGNA, Century Mutual Ins. Co., Crum & Forster Group, Direct Insurance Co., Encompass Insurance Companies, Erie Insurance Group, Grain Dealers Mutual Ins. Co., Horace Mann Co., Lincoln General Ins. Co., N.C. Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co., Seibels Bruce/Universal Insurance Group, Southern General Financial Group, U.S. Auto Services, Virginia Farm Bureau Ins. Services and Virginia Mutual Ins. Co.

Contact Information

Firm Address

Burton, Sue & Anderson, L.L.P.
419 North Elm Street, P.O. Box 20083,
Greensboro, NC 27420






Send email to Burton, Sue & Anderson, L.L.P.

Office Information
 419 North Elm Street, P.O. Box 20083,
Greensboro, NC 27420


About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.