W. Scott Sonntag

Attorney in Columbia, MD
Phi Kappa Phi; Pi Sigma Alpha. Law Clerk to Honorable C. Murray Bernhardt, U.S. Court of Claims, 1980. Speaker, Medical Malpractice Issues: Maryland Trial Lawyers Association; Trial Lawyers Association of Metropolitan Washington, D.C.; Maryland State Bar Association Former Chairman, Professional Malpractice Committee and Former Member, Judicial Selections Committee, Maryland Association of Defense Trial Counsel. Member, Peer Review Committee, Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland. Formerly with: O'Malley and Miles; DeCaro, Doran, Siciliano, Gallagher, Sonntag & DeBlasis, LLP; Foran, Sonntag & Foran, P.A. Tried to verdict over two hundred professional malpractices cases. Named 2006 "Trial Lawyer of the Year" by the Trial Lawyers Association of Metropolitan Washington, D.C. Recipient: Best Lawyer of America, 2007-2010; Super Lawyer in Maryland, 2006-2010; Super Lawyer in Washington, D.C., 2006-2010

Areas of Law

  • Medical Malpractice
  • Birth Trauma
  • Chiropractors Malpractice
  • Cosmetic Surgery Malpractice
  • Dental Malpractice
  • Dental Malpractice Defense
  • Failure to Diagnose Gynecology Malpractice
  • Medical Disciplinary Proceedings
  • Medical Liability
  • Medical Malpractice Defense
  • Medical Negligence
  • Medical-Legal Law
  • Medication Errors
  • Mental Health Professional Malpractice
  • Nursing Liability
  • Nursing Malpractice
  • Nursing Negligence
  • Obstetric Malpractice
  • Oncology Law
  • Optometric Malpractice
  • Orthopedic Malpractice
  • Pharmacists Liability
  • Physicians Professional Liability
  • Physicians Rights
  • Physicians Risk
  • Management Pediatric Malpractice
  • Psychology Malpractice
  • Psychotherapy Law
  • Surgeons Liability
  • Wrong Site Surgery
  • Products Liability
  • Airbag Injury
  • All Terrain Vehicle Products Liability
  • Automotive Crashworthiness
  • Automotive Design Liability
  • Automotive Products Liability
  • Automotive Restraints
  • Automotive Warranty Law
  • Bicycle Products Liability
  • Biomedical Products Liability
  • Blood Bank Liability
  • Breach of Warranty
  • Breast Implant Litigation
  • Chemical Explosions
  • Chemical Products Liability
  • Dalkon Shield Litigation
  • Diet Drug Litigation
  • Drug and Medical Device Defense
  • Drug and Medical Device Litigation
  • Drug Contamination
  • Elevator Liability
  • Engineering Products Liability
  • Environmental Products Liability
  • Escalator Liability
  • Explosions
  • Firearms Litigation
  • Flammable Fabrics
  • Food Borne Disease
  • Food Products Liability
  • Gas Explosions
  • Heart Device Litigation
  • Heavy Equipment Products Liability
  • Industrial Products Liability
  • Lemon Law
  • Manufacturers Liability
  • Motorcycle Products Liability
  • Office Equipment Products Liability
  • Products Defects
  • Product Failure
  • Product Recall
  • Products Safety
  • Product Warning Labels
  • Products Liability Arbitration
  • Products Liability Defense
  • Products Liability Insurance Coverage
  • Products Liability Mediation
  • Products Liability Subrogation
  • Propane Products Liability
  • Recreational Products Liability
  • Recreational Vehicle Products Liability
  • Seat Belt Injury
  • Tire Defect Litigation
  • Tire/Rim Mismatch
  • Tobacco Litigation
  • Vaccine Injury
  • Vehicle Rollovers
  • Warranty Law
  • Welding Products Liability


Overall Client Rating

in Medical Malpractice
4.8 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 03/06/12
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1979, District of Columbia
1981, Maryland
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
U.S. District Court, District of Maryland
U.S. Court of Appeals Federal Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit
U.S. Court of Federal Claims
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Law School Attended

Columbus School of Law of The Catholic University of America
Class of 1979

University Attended

University of Maryland
Class of 1975
Government and Politics, with high honors

Birth Information

Born in 1953
Washington, D.C., July 18, 1953

Associations & Memberships

Prince George's County, Anne Arundel County, Maryland State and American Bar Associations; The Association of Trial Lawyers of America; Maryland Trial Lawyers Association; Trial Lawyers Associ... More

Contact Information


(301) 982-1255


(301) 982-1256


Send email to W. Scott Sonntag

Office Information
W. Scott Sonntag
 10211 Wincopin Circle, Suite 620,
Columbia, MD 21044


Law Offices of W. Scott Sonntag, P.A. (Columbia, Maryland)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.