Jerry A. Williams

Attorney in Gainesville, GA
Editorial Board, Valparaiso Law Review, 1969-1970. Attorney, Internal Revenue Service, 1970-1977. President, Northeast Georgia Estate Planning Council, 1985-1986.
770-531-1481

Areas of Law

  • Estate Planning
  • Tax Planning
  • Business Transactions
  • IRS Representation

 

Overall Client Rating

in Trusts and Estates
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 10/03/11
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1970, Iowa
1976, Georgia
1977, U.S. Tax Court, Court of Appeals of Georgia, Supreme Court of Georgia, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court
1979, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia
1981, U.S. Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit

Law School Attended

Valparaiso University School of Law
Class of 1970
J.D.

University Attended

Valparaiso University
Class of 1967
B.S.C.E.

Birth Information

Born in 1946
Chicago, Illinois, February 22, 1946

Associations & Memberships

State Bar of Georgia.

Contact Information

Phone

770-531-1481

Fax

770-531-1481

Email

Send email to Jerry A. Williams


Office Information
Jerry A. Williams
Member
200 Old Coca-Cola Building 301 Green Street, N.W.,
Gainesville, GA 30501

Loading...

Logo
Smith, Gilliam, Williams & Miles, P.A. (Gainesville, Georgia)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

Anonymity

Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.