Timothy S. Mahoney

Attorney in Freeport, IL
Recipient, Freeport Journal Standard Best of the Region Reader's Choice Awards: voted one of top 3 attorneys in region, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2005; top 1 in 2006, 2007, 2008. President, Student Bar Association. Member of NIU College of Law Moot Court Hall of Fame.
Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Personal Injury


Overall Client Rating

5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 02/15/11
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1992, Illinois
1995, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Credit Cards Accepted
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Law School Attended

    Northern Illinois University
    Class of 1992

    University Attended

    St. Ambrose College University
    Class of 1989

    Birth Information

    Born in 1967
    Davenport, Iowa, March 9, 1967

    Associations & Memberships

    Stephenson County (President, 2002-2008), Illinois State and American Bar Associations; Stephenson County Merit Commission (Chairperson, 1995—); American Association for Justice.... More

    Contact Information




    Send email to Timothy S. Mahoney

    Office Information
    Timothy S. Mahoney
     50 W. Douglas, Suite 300, P.O. Box 158,
    Freeport, IL 61032


    Mahoney & Hauser, Ltd. (Freeport, Illinois)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.