Mrs. Tracy A. Armstrong LinkedIn

Attorney in Freehold, NJ
TRACY ARMSTRONG is a member of the Corporate/Commercial and Civil Litigation Department. She has expertise in representing management in employer/employee disputes and the laws governing the employer/employee relationship. She offers highly skilled representation in claims and matters involving employment law including, but not limited to, the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD), harassment and hostile work environment, as well as the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), family and medical leave (FMLA, NJFLA, NJFLI), Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).

In addition to the defense of litigated claims, Ms. Armstrong provides advice and counseling in drafting and reviewing employee handbook policy manuals, including anti harassment and EEO policies, employment contracts, non-solicitation agreements/restrictive covenants and confidentiality agreements. Ms. Armstrong also conducts regularly scheduled training seminars on a variety of issues including, but not limited to, harassment, interviewing and termination procedures. These services are designated to assist the employer's business operations and to avoid litigation. She also appears before the Wage and Hour Board and Department of Unemployment. Ms. Armstrong also regularly provides counsel to clients in the sensitive and critical areas of severance and termination. Ms. Armstrong has extensive experience in all phases of employment and commercial litigation including pre-trial discovery, motions, depositions, mediation, arbitrations and trials.

Prior to joining Lomurro, Davison, Eastman & Munoz, Ms. Armstrong was an associate at both Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla and Bowe, Caruso & Epstein. At those firms, her practice concentrated in commercial and employment litigation. Ms. Armstrong received her Bachelor of Arts Degree from Monmouth University in 1988. She earned her Juris Doctor Degree from Seton Hall University School of Law in 1991, where she was a director of the Seton Hall University Juvenile Justice Clinic. She is a member of the Monmouth Bar Association (Chair of Labor and Employment Committee) and New Jersey State Bar Association (Labor and Employment Section-Executive Committee). In addition, she has served as a member of the Board of Directors for the Monmouth University Alumni Association.

Ms. Armstrong resides in the Township of Farmingdale with her husband and three children.
Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

  • Employment Law


    Overall Client Rating

    in Labor and Employment
    4.0 out of 5.0

    Communication Ability
    Quality of Service
    Value for Money

    • Data based on 1 reviews
    • Recommended by 1 Client
    • Last reviewed on 10/07/10
    No feedback is available.
    The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
    Are you a former client?  Submit a review

    Experience & Credentials



    Admission Details

    Admitted in 1991, New Jersey
    U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York

    Credit Cards Accepted
    American Express
    Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Seton Hall University Law School
    Class of 1991

    University Attended

    Monmouth University
    Class of 1988

    Associations & Memberships

    Monmouth Bar Association; New Jersey State Bar Association.

    Contact Information


    732-410-2339 Call Now




    Send email to Mrs. Tracy A. Armstrong

    Office Information
    Mrs. Tracy A. Armstrong
    Monmouth Executive Center, Suite 100 100 Willowbrook Road,
    Freehold, NJ 07728


    Lomurro, Davison, Eastman & Muñoz, P.A. (Freehold, New Jersey)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.