Arthur W. Boyce, P.A.

Law Firm in Frederick, MD

Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Rating Not Shown
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.4 of 5

About This Firm

For over 20 years Arthur W. Boyce, P.A. has been committed to providing legal services in a timely and effective manner. The policy of the office is to keep you informed at all times as to the progress of your legal matter. The office represents the average citizen and business facing both serious legal issues as well as routine matters. Mr. Boyce is licensed to practice in the states of Maryland, West Virginia and Pennsylvania and is well-respected in these jurisdictions.

Areas of Law

  • Divorce
  • Adoption Law
  • Child Support
  • Child Custody
  • Visitation Rights
  • Marital Property Law
  • Alimony
  • Mediation
  • Guardianship
  • Bankruptcy
  • Debtor
  • Creditors Rights
  • Business Formation.
  • Criminal Defense
  • Traffic Violations
  • Juvenile Proceedings
  • Real Estate Transactions
  • Civil Litigation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Wills
  • Trusts
  • Estate Planning
  • Estate Administration
  • Corporate Law
Rating Not Shown
This firm has chosen not to display the rating(s) provided by its clients.

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:

Firm Details

Firm Size


Payment Information
  • Accepts Visa, MasterCard, American Express and Discover
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available

Contact Information

Firm Address

Arthur W. Boyce, P.A.
308 West Patrick Street,
Frederick, MD 21701










Send email to Arthur W. Boyce, P.A.

Office Information
 308 West Patrick Street,
Frederick, MD 21701


Office Hours
08:00 AM- 05:00 PM
08:00 AM- 05:00 PM
08:00 AM- 05:00 PM
08:00 AM- 05:00 PM
08:00 AM- 04:00 PM
09:00 AM- 12:00 PM

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.