Leonard E. Eilbacher

Attorney in Fort Wayne, IN
Order of the Coif; Phi Delta Phi. Listed in The Best Lawyers in America, for business litigation. Author: "Comparative Fault and the Nonparty Tortfeasor," 17 Indiana Law Review 903, 1984; "Nonparty Tortfeasors in Indiana: The Early Cases," 21 Indiana Law Review 381, 1988.
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Legal Malpractice
  • Expert Opinion
  • Insurance Bad Faith


Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Experience & Credentials


Of Counsel

Admission Details

Admitted in 1965, Indiana, U.S. District Court, Northern and Southern Districts of Indiana, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court

Credit Cards Accepted
Law School Attended

Indiana University
Class of 1965
with distinction

University Attended

Indiana University
Class of 1962

Birth Information

Born in 1934
Coffeyville, Kansas


U.S. Naval Aviator, 1956-1961

Associations & Memberships

Allen County (President, 1988), Indiana State (Chairman, Legal Ethics Committee, 1993-1995) and American Bar Associations; Indiana Defense Lawyers Association (Diplomate, 1992), retired 20... More

Bar Fellowship

American College of Trial Lawyers (State Chairman, 1990-1992), retired 2009.

Contact Information






Send email to Leonard E. Eilbacher

Office Information
Leonard E. Eilbacher
Of Counsel
Courtside Building 803 South Calhoun Street, Suite 400,
Fort Wayne, IN 46802


Eilbacher Fletcher LLP (Fort Wayne, Indiana)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.