Fred L. Caddell

Attorney in Fort Smith, AR
Phone number not available
View Web Site

Areas of Law

  • Personal Injury
  • Wrongful Death
  • Motor Carrier/Trucking Accidents
  • Social Security Disability
  • Products Liability
  • Insurance Claims
  • Family Law


Overall Client Rating

3.4 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 5 reviews
  • Last reviewed on 07/17/13
Posted by a Consumer on 07/17/13
2.5 out of 5.0
I do not feel like they care about me at all. I call, but they do not return any of my calls.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 06/20/13
3.3 out of 5.0
Would not return phone calls once the final decision was made and we did not qualify financially we did medically. We were supposed to be able to get a copy of the medical records they had to get from the drs. But I called and called and called and never got a return phone call and have never gotten any paperwork back. They also sent me a bill and technically we did not win our case and we were not supposed to have to pay.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1982, Arkansas and U.S. District Court, Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas
1983, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
2006, Oklahoma

Featured Lawyers

The Law Offices of Craig Cook
Fort Smith, U.S.A.
479-668-3804 | Email
Client Rating

5.0 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.4 / 5.0

Chronister, Fields & Flake PLLC
Fort Smith, U.S.A.
479-783-4060 | Email
Client Rating

4.8 / 5.0
Peer Rating

4.4 / 5.0

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.