Michael R. Ohle

Attorney in Fort Pierce, FL
Phi Delta Phi. Member: Honors Society; Business Law Society. Recipient, West Scholastic Achievement Award. Law Clerk to Ray E. Ulmer, 1999.

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Defense
  • Expungements
  • Sex Crimes
  • Extradition
  • Criminal Appeals
  • Felonies
  • Drivers License Suspension
  • Probation Violations
  • Juvenile Crimes


Client Rating

Overall Client Rating

in Criminal Law
3.4 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 3 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 11/22/13
Posted by a Consumer on 07/24/13
4.8 out of 5.0
Very bad place to get busted, very good attorney.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials


Managing Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 2001, Florida
U.S. District Court, Middle and Southern Districts Court of Florida
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Law School Attended

Stetson University College of Law
Class of 2001
Masters in Business Administration

Stetson University College of Law
Class of 2001

University Attended

Florida State University
Class of 1997

Birth Information

Born in 1974
St. Petersburg, Florida. October 2, 1974

Associations & Memberships

St. Petersburg and Saint Lucie County Bar Associations; The Florida Bar; Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers; IGFA; Saint Lucie Cha... More

Hobbies & Interests

Fishing, Boating, Golf

Contact Information


772-460-9801 Call Now



Office Information
Michael R. Ohle
Managing Partner
 423 Delaware Avenue,
Fort Pierce, FL 34950


Ohle & Ohle (Fort Pierce, Florida)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.