Scot D. Goldberg

Attorney in Fort Myers, FL
A founding member of the firm, Scot D. Goldberg is a Fort Myers native and member of the Lee County Bar Association, the Lee County Personal Injury Association, the Florida Bar, the Federal Bar Association, the Federal Court of the Middle and Northern Districts, the Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers, and the Association of Trial Lawyers of America. He currently acts as house counsel for the Coalition for Justice, has served on the Zoning and Planning Advisory Committee for the City of Cape Coral and as a Hearing Officer for the City of Fort Myers. Scot has volunteered his time for a number of years with the Moot Court Program, working with local high school students to give them opportunities to participate in mock court proceedings. He is also an Honorary Deputy for the Lee County Sheriff's Department. The primary focus of Scot's law practice is in Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, and Criminal Law cases.

Scot graduated from the University of South Florida in 1991 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Criminology. One of his interests while attending USF was Social Science; which led to his invitation for membership in Pi Gamma Mu International Honor Society in Social Science.

He then went on to Thomas M. Cooley Law School, where he received his Juris Doctor degree in 1995. He was admitted to the Florida Bar and the U. S. District Court, Middle District of Florida, in 1995. Scot began his legal career as an Assistant State Attorney with the 20th Judicial Circuit, 1995 - 1996. In conjunction with his work at the State Attorney's Office, he received certification in Juvenile Justice and Delinquency from the U.S. Department of Justice. He later became an associate at the law firm of Goldstein, Buckley, Cechman, Rice & Purtz, P.A. Mr. Goldberg was selected for Who's Who in American Law, 2000/2001. In July 2000, Scot became one of the four founding members of the firm.
239-461-5508
Free Consultation | Credit Cards Accepted
Personal InjuryWrongful DeathCriminal LawMedical Malpractice
Personal Injury
40%
Wrongful Death
40%
Criminal Law
10%
Medical Malpractice
10%

 

Overall Client Rating

in Corporate Law, Elder Law and Health Care
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
5.0

  • Data based on 2 reviews
  • Recommended by 2 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 03/23/11
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials

Position

Founding Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1995, Florida
U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    Thomas M. Cooley Law School
    Class of 1995
    J.D.

    University Attended

    University of South Florida
    Class of 1991
    B.A.
    Criminology

    Associations & Memberships

    Florida Bar, Lee County Bar Association, Federal Bar Association, Association of Trial Lawyers of America.

    Hobbies & Interests

    Hunting, fishing, boating, volunteerism

    Contact Information

    Phone 1

    239-461-5508 Call Now

    Fax

    239-461-3915

    Mobile

    239-340-9190

    Phone 2

    888-461-2919

    Email

    Send email to Scot D. Goldberg

    Social Networking



    Office Information
    Scot D. Goldberg
    Founding Member
    The Edison Theatre Building 1533 Hendry Street, Suite 200,
    Fort Myers, FL 33901

    Loading...

    Logo
    Goldberg, Racila, D'Alessandro & Noone, LLC (Fort Myers, Florida)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.