Stephen Rakusin LinkedIn

Attorney in Fort Lauderdale, FL
Phi Alpha Delta. Member, International Moot Court. Author: "Florida Construction Lien Manual," Lexis Law Publishing, 1974; "Florida Creditors Rights Manual," Lexis Law Publishing, 1975.
954-514-9607
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Construction Law
  • Collections
  • Estates Law
  • Matrimonial Law
  • Products Liability Law
  • Wills Law

 

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1974, Florida and U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida
1997, U.S. District Court, Southern District

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Discover
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Florida
    Class of 1974
    J.D.

    University Attended

    University of Florida
    Class of 1972
    B.Jn.

    Birth Information

    Born in 1948
    Providence, Rhode Island, December 23, 1948

    Languages

    English

    Associations & Memberships

    Broward County and American (Member, Forum Committee on the Construction Industry, 1980-1981) Bar Associations; The Florida Bar (Chairman, Mechanics' Lien Law Legislative Subcommittee, Construc... More

    Contact Information

    Phone

    954-356-0496 Call Now

    Email

    Send email to Stephen Rakusin


    Office Information
    Stephen Rakusin
    Member
     2919 E. Commercial Blvd.,
    Fort Lauderdale, FL 33308

    Loading...


    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.