Gavin MacMillan

Attorney in Fort Lauderdale, FL

Gavin MacMillan is an associate in the firm's Ft. Lauderdale office. On behalf of financial services clients, Gavin responds to atypical sales issues and foreclosure matters and regularly resolves title defects found in foreclosure actions. Gavin is a title agent and is licensed as a sales associate under the Florida Real Estate Commission.

Professional Affiliations

· The Florida Bar

(954) 356-2512
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation

     

    Experience & Credentials

    Position

    Associate

    Admission Details

    Admitted in 2007, Florida
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida

    Law School Attended

    University of Florida Levin College of Law
    Class of 2006
    J.D.
    Estates and Trusts Certificate

    University of Miami School of Law
    Class of 2008
    LL.M.
    Real Property Development

    University Attended

    University of Florida Warrington College of Business
    Class of 2003
    B.S.
    Finance, cum laude, Phi Kappa Phi, Beta Gamma Sigma, Golden Key Honor Society

    Birth Information

    Born in 1981
    1981

    Contact Information

    Phone

    (954) 356-2512

    Fax

    (954) 333-3687

    Email

    Send email to Gavin MacMillan


    Office Information
    Gavin MacMillan
    Associate
     101 NE Third Avenue, Suite 1500,
    Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

    Loading...

    Logo
    McGlinchey Stafford (Fort Lauderdale, Florida)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.