Donna M. Ballman

Attorney in Fort Lauderdale, FL

Donna M. Ballman, P.A., a labor and employment law firm representing employees in:

Employment discrimination: sexual discrimination, sexual harassment, disability, race, religious, national origin, color, pregnancy, sexual orientation, marital status and age discrimination claims, representation before EEOC, Florida Commission on Human Relations, county Equal Opportunity Boards.

Negotiation of severance agreements: handling all aspects of severance agreement review and negotiations.

Employment litigation: breach of contract, unpaid wages, unpaid severance, unpaid vacation, whistleblower, illegal wiretapping/privacy, non-compete, Family and Medical Leave Act advice and litigation.

Non-compete agreements: advice regarding non-compete agreements; defense of non-compete enforcement suits and arbitrations; litigation to seek ruling from court on enforceability of non-compete agreements.

Alternate dispute resolution: Florida Supreme Court certified circuit civil mediator; arbitrator for commercial and employment disputes

954-680-6300
Credit Cards Accepted
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 5.0 of 5

Areas of Law

  • Employment Litigation
  • Employment Agreements
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Severance Contracts
  • Whistleblower
  • Labor Law
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Labor and Employment
  • Age Discrimination in Employment
  • Americans with Disabilities Act
  • Confidentiality Agreements
  • Covenants Not To Compete
  • Disability Discrimination
  • Employee Discipline
  • Employee Privacy
  • Employee Rights
  • Employer Intentional Torts
  • Employer Liability
  • Employment Arbitration
  • Employment at Will
  • Employment Breach of Contract
  • Employment Civil Rights
  • Employment Claims
  • Employment Contracts
  • Employment Defense
  • Employment Disability Discrimination
  • Employment Law
  • Employment Mediation
  • Employment Rights
  • Employment Termination
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Law
  • Executive Employment Law
  • Executive Severance Contracts
  • Executive Transfers
  • Fair Employment Practices
  • Family and Medical Leave Act
  • Harassment
  • National Origin Discrimination
  • Noncompete Litigation
  • Noncompetition and Non-Solicitation
  • Agreements
  • Reductions in Force
  • Restrictive Covenants
  • Retaliatory Discharge
  • Sexual Harassment
  • Title VII Discrimination
  • Whistleblower Litigation
  • Workplace Violence

 

Peer Rating

av

Overall Peer Rating

5.0 out of 5.0
  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.

Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials

Position

Member

Admission Details

Admitted in 1986, Florida
1988, U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida
1989, U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida
1999, U.S. Court of Appeals 11th Circuit
2002, U.S. Court of Appeals Federal Circuit

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Discover
Mastercard
Visa
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    University of Miami
    Class of 1986
    J.D.
    cum laude

    University Attended

    Wellesley College
    Class of 1981
    B.A.
    Political Science and Philosophy, magna cum laude

    Contact Information

    Phone

    954-680-6300

    Email

    Send email to Donna M. Ballman

    Social Networking



    Office Information
    Donna M. Ballman
    Member
     5001 South University Drive, Suite G,
    Fort Lauderdale, FL 33328

    Loading...

    Logo
    Donna M. Ballman, P.A. (Fort Lauderdale, Florida)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.