Berges Law Group, P.A.

Law Firm in Fort Lauderdale, U.S.A.
Phone number not available

View Web Site


Overall Client Rating

in Debtor and Creditor, Contracts and Finance
4.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 5 reviews
  • Recommended by 3 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 11/01/14
Posted by a Consumer on 11/01/14
1.0 out of 5.0
This review is for Consumer Protection Counsel which uses Otto Berges name as someone to research because he is an attorney for their law group. Well, this has by far been the worst experience. Consumer protection counsel is scamming me out of my money and not returning my calls. I am making monthly payments of $330.17 for 84 months in attorney fees to represent my debt. However, I am keep receiving summons letters from officers stating I must attend court. This company is a nightmare !!
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 07/29/14
4.8 out of 5.0
The staff helped me, I wish they were open 24/7 though. It can be scary when you need a lawyer.
Report abuse
Posted by a Small Business on 07/23/14
5.0 out of 5.0
Otto was very courteous and extremely nice. The staff was very professional.
Report abuse
Posted by a Consumer on 01/03/14
1.3 out of 5.0
Berges does not return calls, does not return E-Mail. They take your monthly payment but give no service in return that I can see.
No Photo
Law firm response:
No client, without exception ever once, has attempted to contact me directly either by phone or email, and not received a response. This is likely a competitor attempting to discredit my office's reputation, which is incredibly unfortunate and baseless.
Report abuse

People at This Firm

Lawyer Name:
Area of Law:

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.