Kellie A. Peterson

Attorney in Flagstaff, AZ

Kellie A. Peterson is a partner at Mangum, Wall, Stoops & Warden, P.L.L.C., focusing on state and tribal education law. She conducts policy review and revision, and also participates in arbitrating and litigating matters that arise within the scope of her practice with the school districts. Ms. Peterson routinely advises the school districts of their rights and responsibilities. She also represents various other municipal and public entities throughout the State of Arizona.

Ms. Peterson has experience with both public and private sector employment law relating to employment disputes, discrimination investigations, wrongful discharge claims and civil rights proceedings. Ms. Peterson has represented clients in both state and tribal courts and administrative agencies on employment matters.


• Coconino County Bar Association

• Federal Bar Association

• Arizona School Boards Association/Arizona Counsel of School Attorneys

Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating N/A help_info

Areas of Law

  • Employment Disputes
  • Discrimination Investigations
  • Wrongful Discharge Claims
  • Civil Rights Proceedings


Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 2003, Arizona and U.S. District Court, District of Arizona
2004, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit and Hopi Tribal Court
Navajo Tribal Courts

Law School Attended

University of Montana
Class of 2003

University Attended

Gonzaga University
Class of 2000
B.B.A., with honors

Contact Information


928-779-6951 Call Now

Office Information
Kellie A. Peterson
 100 North Elden Street, P.O. Box 10,
Flagstaff, AZ 86001


Mangum, Wall, Stoops & Warden, P.L.L.C. (Flagstaff, Arizona)

About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.