Carleton Penn, III

Attorney in Fairfax, VA
Delta Theta Phi. VTLA, Author and Lecturer: "Defending Driving While Intoxicated," "Defending the Serious Traffic Offender."
Credit Cards Accepted

Areas of Law

Traffic ViolationsCriminal DefenseDUI/DWI
Traffic Violations
Criminal Defense


Overall Client Rating

in Criminal Law, Appellate Practice and Real Estate
5.0 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 4 reviews
  • Recommended by 4 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 09/23/13
Posted by a Consumer on 09/23/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Carleton came highly recommended to me, and I couldn't't of asked for a better representation for myself in the courtroom. Carleton will fight for justice where justice is deserved, and he has my recommendation and support 100%.
Report abuse

Legal Community Activity

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1982, Virginia
1983, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
1984, U.S. Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit

Credit Cards Accepted
American Express
Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Fixed Fees Available
  • Law School Attended

    George Mason University School of Law
    Class of 1981

    University Attended

    Randolph-Macon College
    Class of 1977
    Major: History

    Associations & Memberships

    Fairfax and Loudoun Bar Associations; Virginia State Bar; Virginia Trial Lawyers Association (Member: Executive Counsel, 1990; Board of Governors, 1990); Virginia College of Criminal Defense... More

    Hobbies & Interests

    Life Member, Fairfax Volunteer Fire Department

    Contact Information


    703-962-1164 Call Now




    Send email to Carleton Penn, III

    Social Networking

    Office Information
    Carleton Penn, III
     10511 Judicial Drive,
    Fairfax, VA 22030


    Hale Ball Carlson Baumgartner Murphy, PLC (Fairfax, Virginia)

    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.