Thomas A. Massey

Attorney in Evansville, IN
Dean's List, Purdue University. Note Editor, Valparaiso University Law Review. Teaching Assistant, Legal Research and Writing Program, Valparaiso University Law School, 1983-1984. Registered Family Law Mediator, 1992—. Advisory Board, University of Evansville Legal Studies Program, 1987-2005. Adjunct Faculty, University of Evansville, 1990; Lockyear College, 1988-1990. Faculty, Indiana Judicial Conference, Annual Meeting, 1996. Board Member, Indiana Continuing Legal Education Forum, 1999-2006; Indiana Equal Justice Fund, 1998-2008. Faculty Member, Indiana Continuing Legal Education Forum (ICLEF) Seminars: 7th Annual Family Law Institute, October 14-15, 2009; Master's Series - Advanced Family Law, December 13-14, 2008; Dissolution and Family Law Matters, February 14, 2008; Master's Series - Advanced Family Law, November 7, 2007; Family Law Update, December 7-8, 2005; Tips for Handling Asset Divorce Cases, December 9, 2003; Family Law for Practitioners, November 1, 2001; Tougher Topics of Family Law, October 10, 2001; Divorce Law 301, July 17, 1996; Family Law Notebook, August 23, 1995; Child Support: Litigating the Guidelines, July 13, 1994; Family Law Practice, October 22, 1993; Intermediate Divorce Law, October 11, 1991. Faculty Member, Numerous Evansville Bar Association Continuing Legal Education Seminars. Master, American Inn of Court No. 36. Managing Partner, Bowers Harrison, LLP, 1999-2008. Partner, 1989-1999 and Associate, 1984-1989, Bowers, Harrison, Kent & Miller.

Areas of Law

  • Family Law
  • Guardianship Disputes
  • Trust Disputes
  • Spousal Torts
  • Civil Litigation
  • Mediator


Overall Client Rating

in Family Law and Personal Injury
4.8 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
Quality of Service
Value for Money

  • Data based on 8 reviews
  • Recommended by 8 Clients
  • Last reviewed on 12/13/10
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1984, Indiana and U.S. District Court, Northern and Southern Districts of Indiana
1989, U.S. Supreme Court

Additional Payment Information
  • Fixed Hourly Rates
  • Law School Attended

    Valparaiso University
    Class of 1984

    University Attended

    Purdue University
    Class of 1981

    University of Notre Dame, National Institute of Trial Advocacy
    Class of 1993
    Teacher Training Graduate

    Birth Information

    Born in 1959

    Special Agencies

    President, Vanderburgh County Election Board, 2005—; Police Merit Commissioner, City of Evansville, 2000-2004; Member, Vanderburgh County Election Board, 1994-1996.

    Associations & Memberships

    Evansville (Chairman, Family Law Section, 2006, 2000 and 1994), Indiana State and American Bar Associations.

    Representative Transactions

    Numerous high asset divorce settlements.

    Representative Cases

    Becker v. Fisher, 852 N.E.2d 48 (Ind. Ct. App. 2006); In re Whirlpool Corp. and I.U.E. Local 808, 115 L.A. 34 (2000); L.D.H. v. K.A.H. 685 N.E.2d 43 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996); Union Federal Savings Bank, et. al. v. Chantilly Farms, Inc., 556 N.E.2d 9 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990); DBC Capital Fund, Inc. v. Snodgrass, 551 N.E.2d 475 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990).

    Hobbies & Interests

    Member, Hoosier Musky Hunters.

    Contact Information


    1-812-491-9333 Call Now




    Send email to Thomas A. Massey

    Office Information
    Thomas A. Massey
    Curtis Building 915 Main Street, Suite 502, P.O. Box 3526,
    Evansville, IN 47734-3526


    Massey Law Offices, LLC (Evansville, Indiana)

    Play Law Firm Video
    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.