AS
AS

Andrew Joseph Stunich, III

Licensed for 18 years

Attorney in Eureka, CA

Practice Area: Automobile Insurance, Casualty Insurance, Insurance Coverage 4 more areas of practice + 4 more

Areas of Law

  • Automobile Insurance
  • Casualty Insurance
  • Insurance Coverage
  • First Party Insurance
  • Personal Injury Litigation
  • Real Estate Litigation
  • Local Government Defense

Credentials

Position
Partner
Admission Details
Admitted in 1998, California
Law School Attended
Empire College of Law
Class of 1998
J.D.
University Attended
Humboldt State University
Class of 1987
B.S.

Client Reviews

  • 3.1/5.0 2 reviews
  • 50% client recommended 1 recommendation
  • Communication

    3.0/5.0
  • Responsiveness

    3.0/5.0
  • Quality of Service

    3.0/5.0
  • Value for Money

    3.5/5.0
  • 5.0/5.0 submitted on 07/01/16

    Andy did top notch work for a more than reasonable price. I had visited another attorney at Mitchell, Brisso, Delaney, & Vrieze and he didn't know that specified dates a... Read more

    Andy did top notch work for a more than reasonable price. I had visited another attorney at Mitchell, Brisso, Delaney, & Vrieze and he didn't know that specified dates are an essential piece of creating a legal employment contract. Andy knew that off the top of his head. BDD&V was also going to charge me 10x more than what Andy charged me. {para}Andy does great work. The judge we had at trial was actually saying as much. We ended up settling and I couldn't be happier.

    • Communication

      5.0/5.0
    • Responsiveness

      5.0/5.0
    • Quality of Service

      5.0/5.0
    • Value for Money

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 1.3/5.0 submitted on 07/07/10

    After several requests for an update on how litigation was progressing Mr. Stunich responded by saying how busy he was and suggested that if I was unhappy with his repres... Read more

    After several requests for an update on how litigation was progressing Mr. Stunich responded by saying how busy he was and suggested that if I was unhappy with his representation we should part company. When did provide a "rough draft" of a pleading he was going to file it contained many grammatical errors. When these were pointed out to him he did correct 9 of the 10 errors. He said, "if you do not treat me with respect at all times, I must cease any representation of you."

    • Communication

      1.0/5.0
    • Responsiveness

      1.0/5.0
    • Quality of Service

      1.0/5.0
    • Value for Money

      2.0/5.0

    Read less

Write a Review

Peer Reviews

  • 3.5/5.0 4 reviews
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Legal Knowledge

    3.3/5.0
  • Analytical Capability

    3.5/5.0
  • Judgment

    3.3/5.0
  • Communication

    3.3/5.0
  • Legal Experience

    4.0/5.0
  • 4.4/5.0 by a Sole Practitioner on 11/26/14 in Civil Litigation

    • Legal Knowledge

      4.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      5.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      4.0/5.0
    • Communication

      4.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      5.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 4.0/5.0 by a Associate on 12/12/14 in Civil Litigation

    He sometimes appears not to be organized Read more

    He sometimes appears not to be organized

    • Legal Knowledge

      4.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      4.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      4.0/5.0
    • Communication

      4.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      4.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 3.0/5.0 by a Sole Practitioner on 01/13/16 in Real Estate Litigation

    • Legal Knowledge

      3.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      3.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      3.0/5.0
    • Communication

      3.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      3.0/5.0

    Read less

  • 2.4/5.0 by a Managing Partner on 12/12/14 in Civil Practice

    • Legal Knowledge

      2.0/5.0
    • Analytical Capability

      2.0/5.0
    • Judgment

      2.0/5.0
    • Communication

      2.0/5.0
    • Legal Experience

      4.0/5.0

    Read less

See All 4 Reviews


*Individual reviews provided before 2009 are not displayed