Marios Nicholas Karayannis

Attorney in Geneva, IL
Phone number not available
View Web Site
Client Rating N/A help_info
Submit a client review

Peer Rating 4.9 of 5

Peer Rating


Overall Peer Rating

in Litigation, Personal Injury and General Practice
4.9 out of 5.0

Legal Knowledge
Analytical Capabilities
Communication Ability
Legal Experience

  • Meets very high criteria of general ethical standards
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 01/05/13
5.0 out of 5.0
One of the best attorneys in Kane County, Illinois.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 12/17/12
5.0 out of 5.0
Involved in a recent contested litigation matter with this attorney. He was attentive to his clients needs, well prepared and professional in all respects. It was a pleasure to have a case with this attorney.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 01/16/13
5.0 out of 5.0
Highly skilled litigator
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 12/10/12
5.0 out of 5.0
Superb lawyer who cares deeply about his clients.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 12/09/12
4.8 out of 5.0
Marios is an outstanding lawyer who serves his clients well; he is ethical, compassionate and pragmatic. I would not hesitate to recommend him.
Report abuse
Posted by a Private Practice Attorney on 12/08/12
4.8 out of 5.0
One of the best attorneys in Kane County, Illinois.
Report abuse

Experience & Credentials



Admission Details

Admitted in 1986, Illinois
1986, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. Tax Court

Law School Attended

John Marshall Law School, Chicago, Illinois
Class of 1986
With Distinction, Honors: Order of John Marshall, Law Review: John Marshal Law Review, 1984 - 1986

University Attended

University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana, Illinois
Class of 1983



About Client Rating
About Peer Rating

Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

Determining a Rating

The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

  • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
  • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
  • 1-2.9 Rated

Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

The Reviewers

Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.


Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

Martindale-Hubbell's role

Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.