Mark Goldman LinkedIn

Attorney in East Orange, NJ

MARK GOLDMAN received a B.A. from Rutgers College and a J.D. from Rutgers Law School in 1973 and is licensed to practice in New Jersey, U.S. District Court of New Jersey and the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York.

He was a senior partner in the East Orange/Jersey City Law firm of Tulipan, Goldman and Conk from 1984 to 1992. He resigned from the firm of Tulipan, Goldman and Conk to form the firm of Mark Goldman, A Professional Corporation. Offices are maintained in East Orange, West Orange, Jersey City and Paterson. The firm's practice is concentrated in the areas of consumer bankruptcy law and real estate law.

Prior to entering into private practice, he was the senior supervising consumer staff attorney with Essex-Newark Legal Services from 1973 to 1979. He was a three year member of the Lawyer's Advisory Committee to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey and was member of the Advisory Committee on Chapter 13 Practice in the United States Bankruptcy Court for New Jersey. He is a past member of Essex County Bar Association Executive Committee, Creditor-Debtor Section; a member of the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys; a member of the American Bankruptcy Institute and a member of The National Association of Consumer Advocates. He has lectured on bankruptcy matters for the Institute for Continuing Legal Education and Professional Education Systems, Inc. He was selected as mentor in the Honorable Daniel J. Moore Bankruptcy Inn of Court Program. He has co-authored a section of a book "Bankruptcy Practical Skills Series" for the Institute of Continuing Legal Education. In addition Mr. Goldman co-authored, Inside the Minds, Chapter 7 Consumer Bankruptcy Strategies, Aspatore Books, 2010. He has been selected on numerous occasions as a panelist for the New Jersey State Bar Association Bankruptcy Law Bench Bar Conference. He is also a past member of the Supreme Court of New Jersey District Fee Arbitration Committee and former Chair of Suburban Essex District V-B Fee Committee. He has also been frequently interviewed and quoted in the New Jersey Law Journal and various newspapers concerning bankruptcy issues.

He has represented consumers and small businesses with compassion and understanding for over 38 years.

Litigation Percentage

5% of Practice Devoted to Litigation

Published Works

Contributing Author, Inside the Minds: Chapter 7 Consumer Bankruptcy Strategies, Aspatore Books, 2010

Contributing Author, "Bankruptcy, Practical Skills Series.", Institute for Continuing Legal Education

In re Falotico 231 B.R. 35 (Bkrtcy. D.NJ 1979)

Lee Brown vs. Walter Shaw 174 NJ Super. 32, 415 A. 2d 360 (1980)

Whitmore v. New Jersey Division of Motor Vehicles 349 A.2d 560, 137 NJ Super 492 (1980)

In re Barbara J. Amoako-Attah 7 CBN 12 (1998)

· In re Cappodoca 154 B.R. 639 (Bkrtcy.D.N.J 1993)

· In re Willie Malone (1978, BC DC NJ), 4 BCD 1186, 19 CBC 163

· In re Little 201 B.R. 98 (Bkrtcy D.N.J 1996) 159F 3d 1352 (3d.Cir. 1998) (unpublished table decision)

· In re Joseph Burkhardt 220 B.R. 837 (Bkrtcy D.N.J. 1998)

Classes/Seminars

· Lecturer on Bankruptcy, for the New Jersey, Institute of Continuing Legal Education & Professional Education Systems, Inc.

· Adjunct Writing Professor, Rutgers School of Law - Newark, 1979

Honors and Awards

· Martindale-Hubbell AV Rated

Professional Associations and Memberships

· American Bankruptcy Institute, Member

· National Association of Consumer Advocates, Member

· Essex County Bar Association, Creditor-Debtor Section, Former Member of Executive Committee

· National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, Member

· United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey, Chapter 13 Practice, Former Member of Lawyer's Advisory Committee

· U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Chapter 13 Practice, Former Member of the Advisory Committee

Past Employment Positions

· Tulipan, Goldman and Conk, Senior Partner, 1984 - 1992

· Newark Legal Services, Senior Supervising Consumer Staff Attorney Essex, 1973 - 1979

888-347-1489
Free Consultation

Areas of Law

  • Bankruptcy Law
  • Real Estate Law
  • Debtor/Creditor

 

Overall Client Rating

in Bankruptcy
4.8 out of 5.0

Communication Ability
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Value for Money
4.0

  • Data based on 1 reviews
  • Recommended by 1 Client
  • Last reviewed on 11/02/10
No feedback is available.
The individuals that have reviewed this lawyer have not provided any additional feedback.
Are you a former client?  Submit a review

Experience & Credentials

Position

Partner

Admission Details

Admitted in 1973, New Jersey
1973, U.S. District Court District of New Jersey
1983, U.S. District Court Southern District of New York
1983, U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York
1982, U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit

Additional Payment Information
  • Free Initial Consultation
  • Law School Attended

    Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey School of Law - Camden, Camden, New Jersey
    Class of 1973
    J.D.

    University Attended

    Rutgers College, New Brunswick
    B.S.
    History

    Representative Cases

    In re Falotico 231 Br 35 (Bkrtcy D.NJ 1979); Lee Brown vs. Walter Shaw 174 NJ Super. 32, 415 A. 2d 360 (1980); Whitmore v. New Jersey Division of Motor Vehicles 349 A.2d 560, 137 NJ Super 492 (Ch.Div.1975 ); In re Barbara J. Amoako-Attah 7 CBN 12 (1998); In re Cappodoca 154 B.R. 639 (Bkrtcy.D.N.J 1993); In re Willie Malone (1978, BC DC NJ), 4 BCD 1... More

    Contact Information

    Phone

    888-827-5493

    Fax

    973-676-0253

    Email

    Send email to Mark Goldman


    Office Information
    Mark Goldman
    Partner
     7 Glenwood Avenue, Suite 311B,
    East Orange, NJ 07017

    Loading...

    Logo
    Goldman & Beslow, LLC (East Orange, New Jersey)

    Video
    Play Law Firm Video
    About Client Rating
    About Peer Rating

    Welcome to Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review, a new ratings service that allows you to view and provide feedback on a lawyer or law firm on service and relationship qualities such as Communication Ability, Responsiveness, Quality of Service, and Value for Money.

    Determining a Rating

    The Client Review Rating is determined through aggregation of validated responses. This compilation of Client Reviews translates to a numerical rating and associate descriptive term on a scale of 1 -5. 1 being lowest as "Rated" and 5 being highest as "Preeminent".

    • 4.5-5.0 Preeminent
    • 3.0-4.4 Distinguished
    • 1-2.9 Rated

    Martindale-Hubbell uses a third-party resource to validate that the respondent is a living person, but cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship, which in many cases is confidential. Clients must affirm that they are a client of the lawyer or firm identified for review at the time of the completed Client Review.

    The Reviewers

    Those who complete Client Reviews are clients of law firms who hired a lawyer within the last year, whose matter is not pending, and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be of any type from in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners to private individuals, and even sometimes another lawyer in a different jurisdiction.

    Anonymity

    Client Reviews are anonymous and reviewers' identities are not published; however a summary of basic demographics will be part of the display of responses.

    Why do we collect demographics as part of the review?

    Those who are researching a lawyer or law firm like to see that there are other clients who might be "like them". This is valuable information contributing to the decision-making process of hiring a lawyer.

    Martindale-Hubbell's role

    Martindale-Hubbell facilitates the process of Client Review by gathering responses, validating them and aggregating results for display online. The content of the responses are entirely from reviewers, the clients of the firm or lawyer.

    It is important to note that Martindale-Hubbell does not undertake to develop Client Reviews for all firms and lawyers. Therefore, the fact that a firm or lawyer has not been reviewed should not be construed unfavorably. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review over which Martindale-Hubbell exercises no editorial review or control.